Laserfiche WebLink
<br />We have attached a copy of the executive summary ofthe Inflow/Infiltration Task Force Report for your <br />review. A full copy of the report can be found at: <br />http://www.metroconncil.org/environment/ProiectTeams/I- I-Report.pdf <br /> <br />The final section of the report discusses the authority, conclusions, and recommended actions. The most <br />significant action is that the MCES has given Cities with excessive III nntil2015 to reduce their <br />contribution of clear water into the system. After which, cities still in violation will be charged an <br />additional wastewater rate demand charge on all metered flow. These Cities will also not be permitted <br />to increase, through redevelopment or development, their discharge of sanitary sewer into the system. <br />This could have a significant financial impact to the City of Roseville. It could impact our sanitary <br />sewer rates as well as property owner's ability to reinvest in the City. <br /> <br />Issues: Due to the costs and regional implications, the City has placed a high priority on the prevention, <br />detection, and control of water infiltration and inflow into public sanitary sewer system. All new <br />municipal systems constructed within the City must be designed and installed in accordance with the <br />standard specifications prepared by the City Engineer's Association of Minnesota (CEAM). All private <br />sewer services are inspected by the City for compliance with the Uniform Plmnbing Code. Like other <br />first-ring suburbs, the City acknowledges that the infiltration and inflow problem in Roseville is related <br />to the age ofthe structures built in the city, the age ofthe sewer system itself, and localized areas of high <br />ground water. To reduce the amonnt of infiltration and inflow into the sewer system, the City: <br />· Prohibits the discharge of any roof drainage, storm water, surface water or groundwater into the <br />municipal sewer system. <br />· Evaluates the mnnicipal sewer system and manholes as part of road reconstruction projects. <br />· Annually televises the sewer system to determine if and where repairs are needed. <br />· Actively uses pipe relining and other trenchless technologies to rehabilitate segments ofthe sewer <br />system; <br /> <br />The City's Public Works Department maintains a budget to facilitate the televising, inspection and <br />repair of problem areas throughout the existing system. Manholes in low areas where inflow is suspect <br />have chimney seals installed to reduce inflow concerns. In conjunction with the Roseville Pavement <br />Management Program, the City systematically inspects and televises all sanitary sewer systems within <br />the proposed reconstruction area and includes any necessary repair in the improvement project. <br /> <br />In spite of all of our effort over the last 20 years, the City of Roseville still has III entering the sanitary <br />sewer system. As discussed in the Taskforce Report, cunently it is estimated that after a rain event the <br />City's flow into the interceptor is 1.7 times our allowed limit. Staff believes that this is the result of <br />illegal private connections of roof and floor drains as well as draintile systems to the sanitary sewer. <br /> <br />Discussion: In order to meet the 2015 deadline established by the Met Council. We need to detennine <br />how the City ofRoseville should proceed with a program to reduce the City's 1/1 to meet MCES goals. <br />We anticipate that we will need to develop policy as well as ordinances to implement a new program for <br />the City, and look forward to having the Commission's input. <br /> <br />Recommended Action: <br />Discuss policy issues and implementation plan. <br />