Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Roseville Public Works and Transportation Commission <br /> <br />Agenda Item <br /> <br />Date: October 26, 2004 <br /> <br />Item No: 5 <br /> <br />Item Description: Metropolitan Council Infiltration and Inflow Taskforce Report <br /> <br />Background: The entire City of Roseville is within the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA), <br />therefore the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES) provides treatment plant and <br />interceptor service. There are approximately 180 miles of public sanitary sewers providing service to <br />17,258 households and businesses. Trnnk sewers and 13 lift stations collect wastewater and deliver it to <br />the MCES interceptor sewers. The MCES interceptors serving the City of Roseville include RV-430, <br />RV-431, RV-432 and RV-433. All of the interceptors flow south and eastward where they connect to <br />RV-430, which delivers the waste to the Pigs Eye Wastewater Treatment Plant in St. Paul. Operated by <br />the MCES, this plant accepted 1.8 billion gallons of wastewater from Roseville in 1997 and an estimated <br />1.95 billion gallons in 1999. By contract with the City, MCES provides and maintains the interceptor <br />sewers. <br /> <br />We believe that clear groundwater and surface water is leaking into the city's sewer pipes. Once in the <br />system, it flows to the regional interceptor sewers, and then on to wastewater plants for treatment. <br />Because Roseville is charged for the nmnber of gallons of wastewater they contribute to the system, we <br />are paying for the treatment of clear water. <br /> <br />In addition to the cost of treating clear water, 1/1 can also impact the regional system. Many sections in <br />the MCES interceptor system will not have adequate capacity for future development if the amount of <br />clear water entering the system is not reduced. Another concern is the ability to meet future <br />environmental regulations if reduction is not achieved. The problem is that clear gronndwater and <br />surface water enter sanitary sewer pipes and take up space needed to convey wastewater. Groundwater, <br />for example, may get in through old, cracked pipes (infiltration). Surface flooding during heavy rains <br />can run into sewer pipe access holes (inflow). <br /> <br />To address these issues, the Metropolitan Council in April 2003 appointed an Infiltration and Inflow <br />Task Force. The group's charge was to propose strategies to reduce excessive infiltration and inflow <br />(III) in local and regional wastewater collection systems. The extent of the problem varies from year to <br />year, depending on overall rainfall and the severity of particular rains. The excess water from some <br />commnnities is cunently exceeding the design of several major interceptors. If excessive wet weather <br />flows are not reduced, the risk of overflows (and backups into homes) will increase each year as more <br />homes and businesses are added to the system. The Met Council estimates that not conecting the <br />problem could cost the region an additional $300 to $400 million to construct relief sewers and pump <br />stations to handle the excess flow. <br />