My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2005-05-24_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Agendas and Packets
>
200x
>
2005
>
2005-05-24_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/22/2010 3:55:43 PM
Creation date
6/21/2005 2:07:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
5/24/2005
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
67
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />TRAFFIC ANALYSIS <br /> <br />Regional System Impacts <br /> <br />1-35W and TII 36, principal arterials serving the site, currently operate at capacity in the peak <br />hours and will continue to be congested as the region develops, regardless of redevelopment in <br />the Twin Lakes site. Redevelopment of the Twin Lakes area will increase peak-hour/peak- <br />direction demand on northbound 1-35W by 9 percent north of County Road D and increase <br />demand on eastbound 1H 36 by 7 percent east of Snelling Avenue. <br /> <br />Table 8 shows the estimated effects of the improvements on the nearby principal arterials. The <br />regional Transportation Development Guide includes improvements to both 1-35W and 1H 36, <br />but not until the post-2015 time period. The freeway system currently operates at Level of <br />Service E in the p.m. peak hours. In the year 2020, the freeway system will remain congested <br />regardless of the development scenario. However, with the additional capacity planned for 1H <br />36 and 1-35W the congestion will be no worse than current conditions under even the worst-case <br />condition. <br /> <br />Table 8 <br />Regional System ImpactslPeak Direction Segments <br /> <br /> Existing PM Existing <br /> Peak Hour Level of 2020 PM Peak 2020 Level of <br />Freeway Sel!ment Volume(!) Service (2) Hour Volume Service (2,3) <br />I-35W NB <br />County Road C to 6,378 E 8,300 FIE <br />County Road D <br />TII 88 to 6,551 E 8,500 FIE <br />County Road E2 <br />I-35W SB <br />South of Jet. TII 280 3619 C 5,100 DID <br />TH 36 EB <br />East of Snelling A venue 4,658 FJF 6,300 FID <br /> <br />Notes: <br />(I) Source, MnDOT Loop Detector Report, October 2000 <br />(2) Assumes maximum capacity for LOS D of 2000 vehicles per lane <br />(3) LOS for existing capacity/post-2015 capacity <br /> <br />Twin Lakes AUAR <br />Traffic, Air and Noise Analysis <br /> <br />-17- <br /> <br />SRF Consulting Group, Inc. <br />May 3, 200I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.