My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2005-06-28_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Agendas and Packets
>
200x
>
2005
>
2005-06-28_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/22/2010 3:57:15 PM
Creation date
6/27/2005 10:11:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
6/28/2005
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
92
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />parking lane, would have impacts to the single family property owners on the east <br />side of the road. These impacts include tree removal, retaining wall construction, <br />driveway slope increases, and the shifting of the street 5 feet closer to their homes. <br />This would also impact the cost of the project. <br /> <br />Most of the driveways located along this section of street are long and wide <br />enough to accommodate at least two vehicles parked off ofthe right- of- way. <br /> <br />Between The railroad tracks and Dale Street, the property owners have indicated <br />that they would like to have on-street parking. As described in the existing <br />conditions section, the street right- of- way is 50 feet wide on the west end and <br />narrows down to 40 feet wide on the easterly end. The existing street is 28 to 30 <br />feet wide, and there is no sidewalk. Although the property owners want parking <br />along this street, it is very difficult to accommodate their request for the entire <br />length of the street. It is possible to provide some 32 foot wide sections of the <br />road to allow for parking bays, however, we recommend that these be limited to <br />areas where there are no utility conflicts. <br /> <br />We follows is a discussion of the parking alternatives for the segment of road <br />Between The railroad tracks and Dale Street, <br /> <br />. 50 foot right- of- way area: One side parking requires a 32 foot wide <br />road. Adding in the thickness of the curb, the actual road width is 33 feet. <br />As a result, a 32 foot wide street with attached 8 foot sidewalk requires a <br />minimum of 41 feet of right- of- way. A 32 foot wide street, with a 6 foot <br />sidewalk and 5 foot boulevard, would require a minimum of 44 feet of <br />right - of- way. <br /> <br />This segment has railroad along the entire length, as a result, much of the <br />street widening, without the purchase of additional right- of- way, would <br />have to occur to the north toward residential properties. The impacts of a <br />wider street to the residential lots, as a result of a continuous parking lane, <br />would include tree removal, retaining wall construction, and the shifting of <br />the street 10 feet closer to the single family residential homes on the north <br />side of the road. Also, there are many utilities, including power poles, <br />cable boxes, and hydrants that would need to be relocated to allow for a <br />continuous 32 foot wide road. <br /> <br />. 40 foot right- of- way area: On the easterly end of the project, where <br />there is only 40 feet of right- of- way, we do not have adequate right- of- <br />way to accommodate a 32 foot wide street with an attached sidewalk. The <br /> <br />Project P-ST-SW-05-06 <br />S. Owasso Boulevard Reconstruction <br /> <br />Feasibility Report <br /> <br />21 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.