pm_051102 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

City of Roseville - Planning Commission Minutes for November 2, 2005http://www.ci.roseville.mn.us/council/planning/minutes/2005/pm051102.htm 6.Study and Discussion Issues This issue was tabled to December 7, 2005. The City Attorney was called out of town. 7.Information and Reports a.Sign Code Update (Thomas Paschke): Thomas Paschke reported on progress and will schedule an introductory public hearing for the December 7 Planning Commission meeting. Chair Traynor asked if special meetings would be necessary (not at this time). b.Update on Metropolitan System Statement and Participation Plan (start of Comp. Plan update process- Dennis Welsch)* c.2005 Work Plan Update, A look at 2006 projects* * Items discussed, considered jointly moratorium. interest in their study related to any moratorium on subdivisions and inviting them to seek our assistance, particularly if the study will examine land use ordinances and the comprehensive plan. The motion carried unanimously 7-0. Dennis Welsch reported on progress and described the handout in the agenda packet. He will schedule an introductory public hearing for the December 7 Planning Commission meeting. A general discussion of the Metropolitan Council System Statement and the Comprehensive Plan update ensued. Member Doherty noted the numerous meetings and hearings and suggested a parallel track for these to allow the Commission to also carry on its normal meetings. Member Bakeman noted that the dates in 2006 should also include a joint direction meeting with the City Council. Member Pust suggested fleshing out the participation plan, and suggested a meeting with the Council on this issue. Member Doherty suggested using neighborhood meetings (like the HRA did) and brainstorming and outreach for more public input. Member Boerigter expressed concern that the Commission should not start all this work until the Council Member Wozniak suggested the Commission work jointly with other City Commissions and Boards, having them bring forward changes to their sections of the Plan. Chair Traynor suggested that the Commission should recommend a process to the Council, but without as detailed meeting schedule at this time since the new Council (after January 1) will want to set its own schedule. The Commission consensus was that the Commission will review the draft plan and share comments with staff before next meeting, that the Commission will review and approve a plan at December meeting; and that the Commission would communicate the proposed plan to the council after the 4 of 53/13/2006 8:48 AM