Laserfiche WebLink
City of Roseville - Planning Commission Minutes for December 7, 2005http://www.ci.roseville.mn.us/council/planning/minutes/2005/pm05120... <br />Nays: 0 <br />Motion carried: 7-0 <br />c.Planning File 3628: Request by the City of Roseville to consider amendments to Section 1009 <br />Sign Regulations, of the Roseville City Code <br />Chair Traynor opened the hearing and request City Planner Thomas Paschke to provide a verbal <br />summary of the project report dated December 7, 2005. Mr. Paschke and Member Pust compared drafts <br />of the new sign code amendments and noted that the best models to draw from were Woodbury, <br />Minnetonka and Arden Hills. The structure of the ordinance was discussed and it was noted that the new <br />code would not be more restrictive than the current code. <br />The Commission agreed to review the documents before the January 4 meeting and send comments to <br />Thomas Paschke for inclusion in the next version. City Attorney Scott Anderson explained the hearing <br />process and that the code would only change future signs, not currently existing signs. <br />There was no further public comment. <br />Motion: Member Bakeman moved, second by Member Doherty to continue the sign ordinance <br />hearing to the January 4, 2006 meeting of the Commission. <br />Ayes: 7 <br />Nays: 0 <br />Motion carried: 7-0 <br />6.Adjournment <br />The meeting was adjourned at 7:40 PM <br />The Commission then attended a study session on Roseville and the Minnesota Planning Statutes with City <br />Attorney Scott Anderson. <br />Return to Planning Commission <br />4 of 43/13/2006 8:50 AM <br />