Laserfiche WebLink
City of Roseville - Planning Commission Minutes for December 7, 2005http://www.ci.roseville.mn.us/council/planning/minutes/2005/pm05120... <br />Member Boerigter explained that B-2 is the Retail Business District while B-3 is the General Business <br />District. Chair Traynor asked for traffic impacts. Mr. Paschke explained the work being done by staff and <br />consultant and will be further evaluated with a specific plan is available. Member Wozniak asked how <br />traffic studies are paid for (75% by developer, 25% by City). Member Boerigter asked how Sport <br />Authority\Circuit City would be rezoned in the future. Currently the site is zoned B1-B. City Planner stated <br />that a sporting goods store is only permitted in a B-2 zone. Chair Traynor asked why the B-1 zone was <br />Center is only allowed in a B-1 and B1-B zone. Member Bakeman explained the past history of the <br />proposed, approved, but not-built communications tower on the site. Chair Traynor asked what findings <br />would be necessary to deny such a case. <br />Joe Samuel, civil engineer representing Kimco stated he concurred with the staff report and noted that <br />Kimco is working with neighbors to resolve site and traffic connection issues. He explained the concepts <br />for the uses, and agreed with Chair Traynor that there will be different impacts from that of the franks <br />store. <br />Member Pust asked if there is a concern and\or communication with the adjacent day care facility to the <br />south (no). Chair Traynor asked if parking is adequate for three uses (yes). Member Doherty clarified <br />entrance areas to be on the west and north side of the renovated building. Member Wozniak asked for <br />details of the parking lot connections between sites. Paschke explained the connections and the need to <br />better disperse traffic by use of more connections. <br />There being further public comment, Chair Traynor closed the public hearing. <br />Motion: Member Boerigter moved, second by Member Bakeman to recommend approval of the <br />REZONING from B-1 Limited Business District to B-2, Retail Business District, based on the <br />information contained in Section 5, of the project report dated December 7, 2005 <br />Chair Traynor comments on the concern for increases in retail impact through change and <br />improvements. At what point will the City not be able to support those uses? Staff discussed the <br />regulation now in place to deal with increases in impact throughout the community. Deb Bloom, City <br />Engineer explained that site redevelopment often allows for improvement sin public infrastructures such <br />as the Har-Mar to State Farm to Zimmerman Lake storm flooding problem, now under control with <br />on-site improvements at Har-Mar (Cub), Target and the MN Department of Education buildings. Member <br />White asked if the City could solve some of these problems in advance. Bloom explained that the <br />plan, Member White explained that he liked the bank concept but not the retail use. Member Boerigter <br />explained that the site is retail in nature, consistent with a B-2 zone and location, and the project <br />eliminates a vacant site. Member Doherty supported the concept. The building could be expanded by at <br />least 8,000 s.f. without a rezoning. The bank is the only addition to this retail site. <br />Ayes: 6 <br />Nays: 1 <br />Motion carried: 6-1 <br />b.Planning File 3692: Introduction to Roseville Comprehensive Plan Update Process for 2006 and <br />2007, Metropolitan Council System Statement Issues, and Proposed Participation Plan <br />Chair Traynor opened the hearing and summarized the Comprehensive Plan Participation Plan work to <br />date. A general discussion ensured regarding when the City Council could or should become involved. <br />The Planning Commission agreed that the first step is a meeting with the Council regarding the process <br />and the upcoming AUAR. The staff will prepare an outline of what could be done for the January 4 <br />Commission meeting. The Chair will communicate with the Mayor about a meeting time and place. <br />There was no further public comment. <br />Motion: Member Traynor moved, second by Member Bakeman to continue the hearing and <br />discussion to the January 4, 2006 meeting. <br />Ayes: 7 <br />3 of 43/13/2006 8:50 AM <br /> <br />