My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
vm_090104
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Variance Board
>
Minutes
>
2004
>
vm_090104
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 3:38:20 PM
Creation date
5/1/2006 8:33:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Variance Board
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
9/1/2004
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City of Roseville - Variance Board Minutes for September 1, 2004Page 4 of 4 <br />Motion: Member Doherty moved, seconded by Member Boerigter, to adopt a Resolution <br />approving a 1-1/2 foot Variance to Section 1012.02B3 of the Roseville City Code for Frank <br />Konstantinides, 1911 Dellwood Avenue, based on the findings in Section 5 of the project <br />report dated September 1, 2004, and contingent upon the applicant’s compliance with the <br />conditions of Section 6 of the project report dated September 1, 2004, with the fence setback <br />from the driveway to be five (5) feet, with no fence in that area. <br />Ayes: 3 <br />Nays: 0 <br />Motion carried: 3-0 <br />Member Boerigter asked why 8 feet and not 8 ½ feet. Thomas Paschke explained screening and <br />residential context of the fence. Mr. Paschke recommended that the extra ½ foot is too tall. <br />Mr. Konstantinides said there is noise, many walkers and traffic in the area precluding privacy. <br />Member Boerigter asked if the 8 foot setback is to a 10 foot distance from the driveway. <br />Member Doherty explained that he does not support fencing to 8 ½ feet adjacent to the driveway. <br />Member Doherty suggested 8 feet height and 5 foot setback from the driveway. <br />Chair Bakeman explained that if a trial is placed on the south side, it will be difficult to see a <br />pedestrian and suggested a change to condition B to 5 foot setback of fence from the driveway. <br />Member Doherty and Boerigter agreed, eight feet is the maximum height of the fence. <br />Chair Bakeman asked for direction on the shed (it must be set back 5 feet if moved) <br />5.Procedures <br />The City Planner indicated that on April 4, 2004, the Variance Board adopted an interim set of operating <br />procedures. At the same meeting the Board continued to the next meeting the need to discuss, modify and <br />approve a final set of operating procedures. <br />Member Doherty asked if the Council had designated the three members (yes) <br />Motion: Member Bakeman moved, second by Member Boerigter, to adopt, with changes as per <br />Member Doherty, the interim procedures for the year 2004. <br />Ayes: 3 <br />Nays: 0 <br />Motion carried: 3-0 <br />6.Adjournment <br />The meeting was adjourned at 5:50 PM <br />Return to Variance Board <br />http://www.ci.roseville.mn.us/council/variance/minutes/2004/vb0901.htm5/1/2006 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.