pm_060301 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

City of Roseville - Planning Commission Minutes for March 1, 2006http://www.ci.roseville.mn.us/council/planning/minutes/2006/pm0301.htm Abstain: 0 Motion carried: 6-0 b.Planning File 3692: Continuation - Introduction to Roseville Comprehensive Plan Update Process for 2006 and 2007, Outline of Metropolitan Council System Statement Issues, and Proposed Participation Plan Chair Traynor opened the continued hearing and asked the City Planner for a brief report. City Planner Paschke indicated that this evening discussion should focus on the goals and policies information prepared by the Community Development Director. Commissioner Doherty indicated that he felt a review of this information should be done at a separate Traynor agreed. discussion and would rearrange the times for both meetings if necessary and if supported by the Commission. Chair Traynor indicated support for attempting to have the discussion at a scheduled Commission meeting and not a special meeting if possible, but thought that John Shardlow was presenting in April, which could complicate matters if one or more hearings are necessary. The Commission discussed the prospect of a special meeting and agreed that one could be scheduled if There being no further public comment, discussion was concluded. Motion: Member Bakeman moved, second by Member Doherty to continue the hearing and discussion to the April 5, 2006 meeting. Ayes: 6 Nays: 0 Motion carried: 6-0 Member Bakeman asked if the revised data could be included in the next packet (yes). City Planner asked the Commissioners to follow-up with Dennis with their concerns/comments/and questions. c.Planning File 3628: Continuation - Request by the City of Roseville to consider amendments to Section 1009 Sign Regulations, of the Roseville City Code Chair Traynor opened the continued hearing and asked the City Planner how he would like the discussion/consideration to proceed. City Planner Paschke indicated it would be best to start at the previously had made remarks and/or had concerns. to the proposed code. The Commission and Planner then discussed in detail the definitions section, the master sign plan section and the business/industrial chart. minimize sign glare. Chair Traynor and other Members indicated an interest in reviewing any information Member Wozniak could provide on the subject. Chair Traynor reviewed the discussion and indicated that City Planner Paschke was to follow-up with specific language/proposal regarding electronic signs and flashing signs and continue work with Members Bakeman and Boerigter on refinements to the proposed Code. Motion: Member Bakeman moved, second by Member Doherty to continue the hearing and discussion to the May 3, 2006 meeting (due to the absence of the City Planner at the April 5 4 of 56/7/2006 11.40