Laserfiche WebLink
<br />piece that plays off the theme of the children's game "Duck, duck, grey duck" to remind residents only <br />plastic bottles with a neck are accepted in the curbside recycling program. <br /> <br />The final new item was a refrigerator magnet <br />listing the broad categories of what is accepted <br />in Roseville's recycling program and what is <br />not. Focus group participants loved the <br />simplicity of the design and ease of use. They <br />gave their highest marks to the magnet. <br /> <br />Residents were also sent a calendar of recycling <br />dates that had been previously distributed in the <br />January/February resident newsletter. Copies of <br />the education materials can be found in <br />Appendix A. <br /> <br />One of the test areas was given only the increased <br />recycling behaviors. <br /> <br />Table 1 <br />Educational Material Used in Pilot Prol!ram <br /> <br />How to Recycle More Paper Brochure <br />Where Your Recycling Goes Brochure <br />What Plastics to Recycle Elier <br />Refrigerator Magnet <br />Annual Calendai <br /> <br />to see if it <br /> <br />residents' <br /> <br />Bin/Cart Capacity <br />Data collected by the City plus the results ofthe~.a~d Eureka <br />bin capacity is a key component of getting residents to recycle more. <br /> <br />studies also indicate improved <br /> <br />Three components of capacity emerged for study: larger bins, wheels for bins and carts, and weekly <br />collection. <br /> <br />Larger Bins <br />Roseville's recycling program hasl1?t..kpptJW.\yi)~ r~sidents' need for more storage room. Roseville <br />received a grant frol11thpJ\iletropolitan9?uncil intheeariy 1990's to purchase bins to distribute to residents. <br />Each household ""as provided Qnefree 1 ~~gallon recycling bin. Up until late 2001 City staff only gave out <br />one bin per pers()B even thoughth~recyclingpr()gram expanded to take more material. <br /> <br />While 81 % of residel1t~who recycle4surveyed in 2002 said they use the bins, 54% of recyclers said the bins <br />do not meet their needs. Those residents were then asked what would make the bin better. Sixty-six percent <br />of those residents said mak~jt larger, 61 % said add wheels and 34% said add covers. <br /> <br />Wheels for Bins and Carts <br />The Eureka study found the most significant increase in the amount of recyclable material that was <br />successfully collected and processed was in the zone where residents used two 32-gallon wheeled carts - one <br />for paper and one for bottles and cans. However, the cost of wheeled carts is too expensive for most <br />municipalities to afford on their own - approximately $35 a cart. A reasonable facsimile could be assembled <br />for a more manageable cost. For instance, the current blue bins cost about $5.50 a bin, lids are another $3.00 <br />a piece and wheel kits run about $5 each. So a pair of wheeled bins with lids could be assembled for $27. <br /> <br />Roseville wanted to find out if residents really would be interested in using larger bins with wheels. City <br />staff conducted focus groups on March 13 and March 30, 2004 to ask residents that question. First they were <br /> <br />9 <br />