2005-07-26_PWETC_AgendaPacket - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Scenario F: Control Area Control Collection Schedule Bi-Weekly Recycling Containers 18-gallon bin Number of Households 339 Participation Rate 87.3% 1 Avg. Lbs Collected per HH per Route 26.86 2 NA Most Important Component Resident Satisfaction NA Willing to Pay More NA j Derived from Appendix H Table 3 net average pounds per household calculations 20n a scale of 1 - 4 with 1 being the most impOrtant Residents in this area were not contacted during the study period. There was no change in collection method or frequency. Residents had a slightly higher income level than all the other test areas except for the Contrast area. Residents in this area had the second highest participatiql1rate in the "before" period at 85.25%. The ha.d the lowest increase in the "during" period 0[2..0% ending with the fourth highest rate of 87.3%. The Set out rate remained flat from the "before" throughthe"during" period. The set out rate was the secqnd highest at 75% in the "before" period. It rose .0.35% in the "during" period ending with the fourthl1ighest rate at 75.35%. Thisi<l1"ea had the second highest tons collected per month in the "before" period at 8.2 tons per month. Residents set out .0.94 tons per month more in the "during" period which was the smallest increase and at 11.5% it was the small percentage increase as well. WeighW\Ver~d~t9n11ined8ytaking the gross weight of the loads and subtracting the amolltltQf9()J.lt~minant~.Contaminantpercentages for each day were determined by taking the average of the. samples fOrthat day in the "before" or "during" period composition sorts. Residents in thisar~a set out the mostpounMper household per month in the "before" period at 73.8 Ibs per household per month.iThis area increased 1.9 Ibs per household per month which was the fifth highest increase - outpacing theequcation area. Residents in this area were l1()t~l)rveyed. 34