Laserfiche WebLink
<br />collected co-mingled. Thus the more sorting done by the home owner, the greater the profit rate on the sale <br />of material. <br /> <br />Cities such as Minneapolis that rely on revenue sharing money stay with source separated collection in order <br />to maximize their profits. Other cities such as Minnetonka and Plymouth strike a balance between profits <br />and convenience to residents by using a two-stream system. Residents have to do less work, but the cities <br />receive a lower profit rate. <br /> <br />Where the Money Goes <br />Where the profits go depends on the city. For instance a pOliion of Minneapolis' profit sharing is used to <br />offset costs in other portions ofthe city's budget such as the free drop offoflarge appliances voucher <br />program. Cities such as Plymouth use the profits to reduce the directcostto residents for recycling <br />collection. <br /> <br />to <br /> <br />agreement, the Contractor puts the <br />services from the Contractor such <br /> <br />Profit sharing may not always be in the form of cash. <br />money into an account. The City uses funds from the <br />as an appliance drop off day. <br /> <br /> <br />40 <br />