Laserfiche WebLink
<br />CITY OF BLAINE NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT PLAN <br /> <br />be necessary for the approval process and will help address the issue of <br />displacement/ diversion to other local streets. <br /> <br />Implementation strategies will be limited to those local streets where the 85% speed exceeds <br />5 mph above the posted speed limit. <br /> <br />Implementation of traffic management strategies will be in accordance with the procedures <br />set forth in this document, and in keeping with sound engineering practices, as well as be <br />within the city's available financial and staff resources. <br /> <br />Implementation of any devices will be consistent with the guidelines in the Minnesota <br />Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. <br /> <br />Initial deployments are considered experimental and subject to an interim review by City <br />staff prior to permanent installation. <br /> <br />3.0 Traffic Management Background <br /> <br />The United States has used street closures and traffic diverters dating back to the late 1940s and <br />early 1950s, but it was not until the 1970s that Seattle, Washington completed area-wide <br />demonstrations of traffic management strategies. Since then, traffic management has been <br />continually studied and implemented throughout the United States. Strategies include street <br />closures, traffic diverters, speed humps/bumps, signing, increased enforcement and many <br />others, but they all are implemented to accomplish one of the following: <br /> <br />Modify driver behavior (reduce speed) <br />Modify traffic characteristics (reduce volume) <br />Improve safety (pedestrian and bicyclists) <br />Traffic management can be simplified as a two step process: (1) identify the nature and extent of <br />traffic-related problems on a given street or area and (2) select and implement the proper <br />strategy for reducing the identified problem. The traffic management strategies discussed in <br />this document are solutions to a narrowly defined set of problems and are not universally <br />applicable or effective at solving all problems. The wrong traffic management strategy used in <br />the wrong application will not improve conditions - it will only increase City costs and may <br />even make conditions worse. <br /> <br />Since not all strategies are appropriate for every problem the City has developed a process to <br />identify the appropriate solutions. The process includes identifying the problem, evaluating <br />potential strategies, and implementing appropriate measures while including public <br />participation and governmental approval. This process is summarized in Section 4. <br /> <br />The process and strategies included in this document are intended to be used on streets <br />classified as local residential streets to reduce speeds and volumes. (Streets within the City of <br />Blaine are classified based on definitions from the Metropolitan Council defined in Appendix C <br />of the Blaine Transportation Plan. The current Road Classification Map, Figure 4.10 from the <br />Blaine Transportation Plan, identifies street classifications within the City of Blaine - see <br />Appendix D.) By definition arterials and collector roadways are intended to have higher speeds <br />and accommodate higher volumes; therefore it would be against the function of arterials or <br />collectors to implement traffic management strategies. These roadways are intended to operate <br />efficiently with high volumes and speed. When arterials and collectors are operating efficiently <br />they provide the necessary mobility for the traveling public and prevent the need to divert to <br />the residential street network. <br /> <br />APRIL 2005 <br /> <br />2 <br />