My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006-04-25_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Agendas and Packets
>
200x
>
2006
>
2006-04-25_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/22/2010 4:09:27 PM
Creation date
9/11/2006 10:33:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
4/25/2006
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
107
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />CITY Of BLAINE NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT PLAN <br /> <br />most applied and successful measures as documented in the research summarized in Appendix <br />B. The toolbox includes a brief description of the strategy, its effects on volume, speed, noise, <br />and safety, a discussion of its advantages and disadvantages and design considerations. The <br />following strategies are included in the toolbox: <br /> <br />Traffic Control Devices <br /> <br />Roadway Adjustments <br /> <br />- Vehicle Restrictions <br /> <br />- Narrowing Lanes <br /> <br />- Turn Restrictions <br /> <br />- Chokers <br /> <br />- One-Way Streets <br /> <br />- Mid-Block Narrowing <br /> <br />- Watch Children Signs <br /> <br />- Chicane <br /> <br />- Stop Sign Implementation <br /> <br />Vertical Elements <br /> <br />- All-Way Stop Sign Implementation <br /> <br />- Speed Humps/BumpsfTables <br /> <br />- Parking Restrictions <br /> <br />- Raised Crosswalk <br /> <br />- Pavement Markings <br /> <br />- Median Barrier <br /> <br />- Speed Limits <br /> <br />- Traffic Circle <br /> <br />Enforcement <br /> <br />- Street Closure <br /> <br />- Increased Enforcement <br /> <br />- Full / Diagonal Diverter <br /> <br />- Variable Speed Display Board <br /> <br />- Partial Diverter <br /> <br />Effectiveness of Strategies <br /> <br />As stated earlier, traffic management strategies are not universally applicable or effective at <br />solving all problems. The Institute of Transportation Engineers has collected data on the <br />effectiveness of traffic management strategies implemented throughout the United States. Table <br />2 provides a summary of this data and can be useful in the selection of appropriate traffic <br />management strategy to implement. Along with the information provided in Table 2 on <br />effectiveness, the following are some other effectiveness considerations: <br /> <br />Traffic control devices, by themselves, are almost never effective at reducing traffic <br />volumes or vehicle speeds. <br /> <br />Enforcement can be effective if applied regularly and over an extended period of time. <br /> <br />In most cases, enforcement will result in local residents being ticketed. <br /> <br />Roadway adjustments (narrowing) have proven to be moderately effective but at high <br /> <br />implementation costs. <br /> <br />Vertical elements (primarily speed humps/bumps) have proven to be moderately <br />effective but neighborhood acceptance has been mixed. <br /> <br />The combination of enforcement plus other strategies has proven to be the most effective <br />approach. <br /> <br />APRIL 2005 <br /> <br />7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.