My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006-04-25_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Agendas and Packets
>
200x
>
2006
>
2006-04-25_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/22/2010 4:09:27 PM
Creation date
9/11/2006 10:33:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
4/25/2006
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
107
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />CITY OF BLAINE NEIGHBORHOOD TRANSPORTATION PLAN <br /> <br />While the city will cost share only the implementation costs, the consideration of future <br />maintenance costs are also a factor for determining the most appropriate strategy. While the <br />implementation of a traffic sign may appear to be the least expensive option at only $250, the <br />additional $100 per year of annual maintenance needs to be considered. A comparison of the <br />annual costs for the most common strategies for speed reduction, increased enforcement and <br />speed humps, is included in Table 4. <br /> <br />TABLE 4 <br />Comparison of Annual Cosfs <br /> <br />Measure Initial Cost Annual Cost Annual Revenues <br />Photo~radar (ownership option) $85,000 $145,000 $40,000 <br />Photo-radar (lease option) $214,000 $40,000 <br />Targeted Police Enforcement $70,000 $194,000 $40,000 <br />Speed Humps $300,000 $30,000 $0 <br /> <br />Source: ITE, Traffic Calming - State of Practice <br /> <br />Step 5 - Conduct Neighborhood Meeting and Petition <br /> <br />After the completion of the traffic study and the development and evaluation of potential <br />strategies, the city will wither hold a Neighborhood Meeting or distribute a letter to inform the <br />community on the process and results of the traffic study and provide information on the <br />recommended strategies. Based on the engineering study and input from residents, the city will <br />make a preliminary determination and recommendation for the need of traffic management <br />strategies, <br /> <br />Step 6 - Traffic Management Strategy Approval <br /> <br />Once the traffic study results, management strategies, and cost estimates have been provided to <br />affected neighborhood residents, a survey jpetition will be circulated to ascertain whether or <br />not the neighborhood approves of the recommended strategy and are willing to cover the <br />potential costs of implementation, The recommended strategy will not be implemented without <br />the support of 65% of the project neighborhood and 50% of any affected neighborhood. <br /> <br />Once approval is obtained from the neighborhood the strategy will be presented to the City <br />Council for approval. <br /> <br />Step 7 - Implement Temporary Strategy and Monitor <br /> <br />In most cases, the strategy will be implemented with temporary materials and remain in place <br />for approximately three to six months depending on the type of improvement. The strategy will <br />be evaluated to determine if it addresses the identified problems and is consistent with the <br />Neighborhood Traffic Management Plan goals. During the test period residents may provide <br />comments to the City Engineering Department regarding the improvement. At any time during <br />this test phase appeals of the decision for installing the strategy can be submitted and <br />forwarded to appropriate staff. <br /> <br />APRIL 2005 <br /> <br />10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.