My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006-04-25_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Agendas and Packets
>
200x
>
2006
>
2006-04-25_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/22/2010 4:09:27 PM
Creation date
9/11/2006 10:33:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
4/25/2006
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
107
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Traffic Control Devices <br /> <br />Stop Sign Implementation <br /> <br />Purpose <br />Regulatory sign that is used to assign right-of <br />way at an intersection. Only recommended for <br />installation if specific guidelines are met in <br />accordance with the Minnesota Manual on <br />Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MnMUTCD). Stop <br />signs should not be used for speed control or <br />volume reduction and should not be installed on <br />the major street unless justified by an <br />engineering report. <br /> <br /> <br />R1-1 <br /> <br />Source: FHWA Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices <br /> <br />Effects <br />Volumes Little or no effect <br />Speed Little or no reduction in speed, speed possibly increases due to drivers speeding <br /> up to make up for time lost at the stop sign <br />Traffic Noise and Air Noise is increased near the intersection due to the increase activity of <br /> acceleration. Air quality worsens due to deceieration, idling and acceleration <br />Traffic Safety Possible increase in crashes, possibly due to the stop signs being unexpected or <br /> deemed unnecessary, therefore encouraging rolling stops or by instilling a false <br /> sense of security in crossing motorists and pedestrians. <br />Advantages . Inexpensive installation costs (do require continual maintenance costs) <br /> . Defines driver's right-of-way <br /> . Increase opportunity for pedestrians to cross the roadway <br /> . May discourage cut-through traffic <br />Disadvantages . Can cause negative traffic safety impacts if sign is not warranted <br /> . May result in mid-block speeding <br /> . Increasing levels of intersection control are associated with increased <br /> frequency of crashes. <br /> . Difficult to enforce full stop control compliance <br /> . Could result in increase in speeds between the signs as drivers try to make up <br /> for lost time <br />Problems Targeted . At intersections where right-of-way is confusing <br />Design . Guidelines need to be met as established in the Minnesota Manual on Uniform <br /> Traffic Control Devices <br /> . In most cases the street carrying the lowest volumes should be stopped to <br /> minimize the number of vehicles stopping <br /> <br />APRIL 2005 <br /> <br />17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.