My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006-05-23_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Agendas and Packets
>
200x
>
2006
>
2006-05-23_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/22/2010 4:13:38 PM
Creation date
9/11/2006 10:46:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
5/23/2006
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Ayes: 3 <br />Nays: 0 <br />Abstain: I <br />Motion carried <br /> <br />4. Communication Items <br /> <br />Deb Bloom discussed mapping being done by FEMA. Currently, there are <br />no flood zones in Roseville, but that could change with this new mapping <br />being done. Chair Wilke asked if residents could be notified of their new <br />status. Duane Schwartz said that when the mapping is completed, <br />residents would definitely be notified; if not by FEMA, then by the city. <br />The map will be available at the end of September. <br /> <br />Deb Bloom updated the Commission on several other projects going on in <br />Roseville. <br /> <br />Duane Schwartz updated the Commission on City Council issues. <br /> <br />5. Erosion Control Ordinance (Revised) <br /> <br />Deb Bloom presented the revised ordinance for the Commission's review <br />and went over the latest changes. <br /> <br />Member Willenbring questioned the item under enforcement and whether <br />it was fair as stated that if erosion control specifications aren't met, all <br />permits would be pulled for all jobs being done by the contractor within <br />the City of Roseville. Bloom said the city attorney had advised that it was <br />a tool in the toolbox of enforcement, and it's just an option that could be <br />used. Member Neprash said it might be the only way to get the <br />contractor's attention if they were virtually done with the job and just <br />needed to do some cleanup. <br /> <br />Member Neprash said it might be a good idea to have stronger language <br />regarding removal of temporary erosion control devices stating that the <br />contractor is still responsible even after the city has inspected and signed <br />off on the site. <br /> <br />Duane Schwartz said the next step in this ordinance process would be to <br />introduce it to the City Council. <br /> <br />Member Neprash moved to send the ordinance to the City Council. <br />Member Fischer seconded. <br /> <br />Ayes: 4 <br />Nays: 0 <br />Motion carried <br /> <br />Page 2 of5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.