Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Page 2 of 5 <br /> <br />for additional contracted televising services would be sought. <br /> <br />Discussion included those utilities that were fee-supported; types of <br />~"aluation systems for utility infrastructure; ongoing GPS and camera- <br />dies of existing infrastructure as applicable, particularly during street <br />,,,constructions; types of material utilized for utility piping; ongoing breaks <br />and replacements as appropriate; the open bid process for line replacement; <br />and the need to make sure utility fees were established at adequate levels <br />to build a reserve for ongoing replacement and maintenance. <br /> <br />It was the consensus of the PWETC that the City attempt to adequately fund <br />the infrastructure needs of the City proactively and on an ongoing basis <br />rather than experiencing an onslaught of unexpected and major expenses in <br />emergency-type situations. <br /> <br />Additional discussion included the PWETC's participation in continuing <br />discussions between residents of the James Addition and MnDOT regarding <br />the cross-over situation as being facilitated by Councilmembers Ihlan and <br />Kough. <br /> <br />Assignment of Issues <br /> <br />How can the PWETC get more involved and be more productive in the <br />issues that come before the Council? <br /> <br />PWETC Commissioner Willenbring encouraged the City Council to provide <br />more assignments and areas they could assist the City Council to utilize <br />their expertise and alleviate the Public Works Department and City Council's <br />workload. <br /> <br />uncilmember Ihlan sought the Commission's input on the need to <br />promote and stabilize the City's Capital Improvement Program (CIP). <br /> <br />Invasive Species: What role do you see for the PWETC in getting <br />control of this problem (i.e., buckthorn and others)? <br /> <br />Extensive discussion was led by Commissioner Willenbring related to <br />eradication and control of invasive species within the City, its open space <br />and/or parks - those private areas and those public in nature. Commissioner <br />Willenbring noted the substantial discussion at the "Imagine Roseville 2025" <br />community visioning process related to preserving open space in the City, <br />but opined the need to identify "Open Space," and whether it was simply the <br />absence of buildings, or understory vegetation requiring maintenance and <br />utilization. <br /> <br />Discussion included Buckthorn and Boxelders; the Harriet Alexander Nature <br />Center (HANC) and marshland vistas are now overgrown and hidden due to <br />large trees and lack of maintenance over the years since it was built in the <br />1990's; education is needed to get more people involved in ongoing <br />maintenance; the changing nature of the City from rural to second-ring <br />suburb; multi-year maintenance and eradication necessary to systematically <br />control invasive species' growth; volunteer commitment versus paid <br />employee assignments for maintenance; and the observation that invasive <br />plants were not unique to the City of Roseville. <br /> <br />D~rks and Recreation Director Lonnie Brokke provided his perspective <br />arding the invasive species in the City's parks and the costs for ongoing <br />'" adication; various options for removal on private and public properties; <br />previous identification of invasive species at five park areas and specific <br />discussions determining a systematic approach, similar to the City's <br /> <br />file:/ /C:\DOCUME-l \DONNA-l.KOO\LOCALS-l \ Temp\ 7UUFT09F.htm <br /> <br />08/17/2006 <br />