Laserfiche WebLink
City of Roseville - Planning Commission Minutes for June 7, 2006http://www.ci.roseville.mn.us/council/planning/minutes/2006/pm0607.htm <br />vacant parcel, and the Super 8 Hotel are directly east of the parcel along Prior Avenue. <br />Mr. Paschke reviewed staff rationale for zoning designation for the property; and determination that no major <br />impacts to traffic, other than that the site was currently vacant, and had supported the former use as a truck terminal <br />and subsequent vehicle traffic. Mr. Paschke reviewed elevations; identified the access/entry to the site at the corner <br />as preferable to staff; addressed building materials, signage and site improvements; parking; and site <br />improvements, including grading, utilities, setbacks, landscaping, drainage and pending permit approval from the <br />tional parking greater than demanded by <br />City Code to address anticipated needs for patrons. <br />Staff recommended approval of the request; noting that this was a first step in the process and that staff would <br />continue to work with the applicant throughout the process. <br />Discussion included how long the site had been vacant and current prohibited use of the site as storage for new <br />vehicles by an adjoining property owner; provision for the CUP to expire within six (6) months without building <br />permit application; recording of the CUP on the property with standard and specific conditions. <br />Commissioners discussed landscaping plans, concurring that additional green space on the lot in the parking area <br />and to break up the building mass were preferred; with staff advising that, as part of the process, the applicant <br />site and landscape plans in accordance <br />with provisions of this particular zoning district; with the applicant meeting the 5% landscaping provision <br />requirement. <br />Further discussion included intended demolition of the existing building; current process of Phase I and Phase II <br />environmental work, and pending Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) approval of the exterior and interior <br />building and site demolition; ultimate permitting by the City for demolition work to commence, following staff <br />analysis; and proposed hours of operation of the facility. <br />The applicant, Jerry Collins of L.A. Fitness and Joe Samuels, RLK Consultants (engineer or architect) were present. <br />Mr. Collins thanked Mr. Paschke for his thorough presentation of the request; and thanked staff for making the <br />application process a good experience. <br />Mr. Collins advised that of the number of franchises for L.A. Fitness, there were only two (2) operating on a <br />twenty-four (24) hour basis, but demand would dictate the hours of operation. <br />Mr. Paschke noted that there would be minimal impact to adjacent properties in that zoning district. <br />There were no comments from the public. <br />Commissioner Bakeman noted the need to add a condition under Section 9 for landscape plan review; staff <br />concurred. <br />Chair Traynor closed the Public Hearing <br />Motion: Member Bakeman made a motion, seconded by Member Roe, to recommend to the City Council <br />approval of the REZONING from I-1, Light Industrial District to B-2, Retail Business District, based on the <br />findings of Section 6 of the project report dated June 7, 2006. <br />Ayes: 7 <br />Nays: 0 <br />Abstain: 0 <br />Motion carried: 7-0 <br />Motion: Member Bakeman made a motion, seconded by Member Roe, to recommend to the City Council <br />approval of the CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT allowing the construction of a 55,000 square foot fitness center <br />on the former Mastell Brothers Trucking parcel, 2420 Cleveland Avenue, based on findings of Section 7 and <br />the conditions of Section 9 of the project report dated June 7, 2006; amended to add a condition to Section <br />Ayes: 7 <br />Nays: 0 <br />Abstain: 0 <br />Motion carried: 7-0 <br />Chair Traynor advised the applicant of the approval process, with the Case to be heard by the City Council at their <br />June 20, 2006 meeting. <br />2 of 82/6/2007 11.08 <br /> <br />