pm_060607 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

City of Roseville - Planning Commission Minutes for June 7, 2006http://www.ci.roseville.mn.us/council/planning/minutes/2006/pm0607.htm Goals & Policies, including a matrix. Commissioner Roe reviewed the draft text; specific goals and related poli existing language to eliminate redundancy with other goals, noting that the content was retained with little change. Discussion included the ongoing community visioning process in conjunction with current and/or future Comprehensive Plan Updates as part of the review process and current goals and policies. Further discussion included redesigning format while not impacting substance to create a more readable, measurable document and clear guidance for land use. Commissioner Bakeman opined her support of the revised document as keeping the information together; cautioning the need to keep the categories (i.e., vision; goals; strategies; tactics; and policies) consistent throughout the document for future interpretation by staff and future decision-makers. It was Commissioner consensus to include a definition section at the beginning of the document. Commissioner Doherty thanked his fellow sub-committee members with giving him credit for the draft document, however acknowledged his lack of involvement in the process. Commissioner Wozniak discussed outcomes and their intended purpose and place in the process. Further discussion included the role of the Planning Commission in the update; incorporation and involvement in the community visioning process and facilitating transition of those visioning statements into the Comprehensive Plan Update; review of other Comprehensive Plans as to their structure, goals Discussion ensued with how best to obtain and review other Comprehensive Plans, sources, the MN Department of consensus that a subcommittee should review the selected sample Plans and provide comment to the full Commission. Commissioners Roe and Doherty volunteered to take on this task and report back on a select number (i.e., 10) more attractively structured plans; with Commissioner Wozniak offering to contribute several sample Master Plans identifying similar criteria for review. Member Roe provided introduction to the memos and matrices he developed for reviewing the current goals and policies. General discussion ensued that reached tentative agreement that the next steps involve reorganization of will come out of the visioning process. Members Roe and Doherty, along with Chair Traynor will work over the next month on restructuring the environmental section as a pilot project to determine the feasibility of reworking the rest of the document. Motion: Member Bakeman moved, seconded by Member Doherty to continue the Public Hearing on the Comprehensive Plan Update to a future meeting. Ayes: 7 Nays: 0 Abstain: 0 Motion carried: 7-0 6.Information and Reports Commissioner Traynor reviewed the community visioning process to-date; noted his inability to serve on a subcommittee due to his involvement in the Steering Committee; and encouraged Planning Commissioners to make application for involvement in their preferred areas of interest; and the role, or lack thereof, of the consultant and City Council in the process. Chair Traynor reminded Commissioners of the upcoming joint meeting of the City Council and Planning Commission and proposed agenda. Chair Traynor and Commissioners discussed and reached consensus that the July 2006 Planning Commission be rescheduled from Wednesday, July 5, 2006 to Wednesday, July 12, 2006. Chair Traynor recommended that the next John Shardlow presentation be scheduled at a special meeting, rather than following an extensive Public Hearing agenda; and further recommended that the meeting be noticed to the entire community as part of the visioning process. Commissioner Bakeman sought to receive prior notice of proposed cases (i.e., Mounds View School District sketch plan) in a timelier manner, so she had the information prior to the public contacting her with issues to agenda items she is 7 of 82/6/2007 11.08