pm_060712 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

City of Roseville - Planning Commission Minutes for July 12, 2006http://www.ci.roseville.mn.us/council/planning/minutes/2006/pm0712.htm After further discussion, it was the consensus of the Commission that staff be given discretion to determine what is reasonable to determine traffic circulation on the site regarding limiting the total parking spaces for display and customer parking, given the limitations apparent on and the industrial nature of the site. Motion: Member Boerigter moved, seconded by Member Roe, to RECOMMEND APPROVAL of a Road C based on the comments in Section 4, the findings of Section 5, and conditions of Section 6 of the project report dated July 12, 2006; as amended to include a condition: that the applicant will work with staff to apply appropriate landscaping to soften the frontage along County Road C in keeping with improved aesthetics of the roadway; deletion of existing condition 6.1(c) as appropriate; and replacement with new condition 6.1(c) that the applicant will provide parking lot striping to accommodate parking and drive lanes to achieve adequate traffic flow as prescribed by the City Engineer and City Planner. Ayes: 4 Nays: 1 Abstain: 0 Motion carried: 4-1 Chair Traynor reviewed the process for the July 24, 2006 City Council review of the Planning Commission recommendation. f.Planning File 3692: Continuation -- Introduction to Roseville Comprehensive Plan Update Process Chair Traynor continued the Public Hearing of the Roseville Comprehensive Plan Update Process; recognizing the subcommittee work of Commissioners Dan Roe and Jim Doherty and additional information they had provided for full Commission review related to the vision statements, goals and policies. Commissioners Roe and Doherty had researched Comprehensive Plans from other Cities for additional background information; and the relationship to the ongoing Community Visioning process. Motion: Member Doherty moved, seconded by Member Roe, to carry over discussion of the Comprehensive Plan Update Process to the next meeting. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 Abstain: 0 Motion carried: 5-0 6.Information and Reports Given the lateness of the hour, Chair Traynor briefly summarized his recent joint meeting with other Advisory Metropolitan Council; the Imagine Roseville 2025 Community Visioning process; and recent appointments to various subcommittees for additional discussion. Chair Traynor ruled that additional discussion would continue at the next scheduled Planning Commission, to allow additional review by Commissioners of proposed timelines for the various components of the Update. City Planner Paschke advised that staff was attempting to schedule another session with John Shardlow, as recently authorized by the City Council. However, Mr. Paschke noted the fairly-booked Planning Commission docket, and Traynor advised the need to consider a special date to include additional audience space for those involved in the It was suggested by Commissioner Roe, and was the consensus of the Commission, to put continuation of the Mr. Paschke advised that staff would provide public notice in accordance with Commission directive. Commissioner Roe advised that the Rental Licensing Group meeting through the Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) were actively interested in moving forward with their recommendations to the City Council within the next few 11 of 122/6/2007 11.11