pm_060906 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

City of Roseville - Planning Commission Minutes for September 6, 2006http://www.ci.roseville.mn.us/council/planning/minutes/2006/pm0906.htm Mr. Stark opined that he would advocate that the technical aspects of the Comprehensive Plan Update be completed by 2008. Mr. Stark noted that technical updates would be made annually, while continuing to go through the process to amend the Comprehensive Plan, and at the same time, advocating for the best Comprehensive Plan that can be put together for the community and noting that time is of the essence; and his intent to continue moving forward until a barrier was erected. Mr. Stark advised that he would continue advocating to the City Manager and City Council for funds, and if it became apparent funds were not available, then he would implement Further discussion included work to-date by other advisory commissions on their Systems Statements; visioning process subcommittees and how their work may translate into the Comprehensive Plan at a later date; and the need to continue aggressively pursuing the Update. Mr. Stark recognized the work of City Planner Thomas Paschke, noting that he had asked Mr. Paschke to list out the technical issues needing updating and what staff and the Commission needed to do to accomplish the task. Chair Traynor advised that, at the next meeting, Commissioners would be seeking a clear perspective from staff related to what they envision for immediate work on the Comprehensive Plan Update; if the proposed Work Plan visioning process and overall Plan Update; staff input for an aggressive approach; and defined participation and Plan. Motion: Member Bakeman moved, seconded by Member Doherty, to carry over discussion of the Comprehensive Plan Update Process to the next meeting. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 Motion carried: 5-0 6.Information and Reports a.Tree Preservation and Replacement Plan Chair Traynor requested staff input on options to consider related to tree preservation plans and enforcement of Discussion included the broader issue of a Tree Preservation Ordinance as it related to all properties, not just for specific new development, and subsequent requirements and enforcement; whether Roseville should have such an ordinance and whether there was City Council support for such an ordinance; lack of specificity in Current City Code 703 and lack of an enforcement mechanism; and conditions of permit approval and relationship to issuance of building permits. the City for enforcement. Mr. Stark noted that, with staff time already at a premium, reviewing tree preservation plans of other cities would be an appropriate intern project. Commissioner Wozniak suggested the National Arbor Day Foundation as a valuable source of information. b.Staff Appreciation meeting. Commissioners concurred. 7.Adjournment The meeting was adjourned at 10:34 PM 9 of 102/6/2007 11.15