Laserfiche WebLink
Planning Commission Meeting <br />Minutes – Wednesday, November 01, 2006 <br />Page 10 <br />Commissioner Bakeman thanked Commissioner Wozniak for incorporating the additional <br />condition related to hazardous waste. <br />Ayes: 6 <br />Nays: 0 <br />Motion carried. <br />Chair Traynor advised that the case would come before the City Council at their November <br />13, 2006 meeting. <br /> RECESS <br />Chair Traynor recessed the meeting at 8:22 p.m. and reconvened at 8:35 p.m. <br />Commissioner Doherty returned to the meeting at this time. <br /> c. PLANNING FILE 3790 <br />REZONING, <br />Rottlund Homes and David Bernard Builders & Developers seek approval of a <br />GENERAL CONCEPT PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, PRELIMINARY PLAT, AND <br />VACATION OF EASEMENTS AND PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY <br /> for the Twin Lakes <br />redevelopment area. <br />Chair Traynor opened the Public Hearing for Planning File 3790 at 8:35 p.m. <br />City Planner Thomas Paschke reviewed the request of Rottlund Company, Inc. seeking <br />support for Twin Lakes West, a fifty-eight (58) acre (approximate) redevelopment, that <br />requires approval of a RIGHT-OF-WAY/EASEMENT VACATION, PRELIMINARY PLAT, <br />REZONING, AND GENERAL CONCEPT PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT. Staff noted that <br />the project consists of approximately twenty-seven (27) acres of residential, twenty-four (24) <br />acres of office, and seven (7) acres of outlots for an approximate total of fifty-eight (58) acres. <br />Mr. Paschke noted that all actions should occur in the same order and format to support each <br />other as outlined in the staff report. <br />Comp Plan <br />Community Development Director John Stark reviewed the Comprehensive Plan review, as <br />detailed in Sections 5.1 – 5.8 of the staff report dated November 1, 2006; with staff <br />concluding, with input from the City Attorney’s Office, that the underlying Comprehensive <br />Plan designation of the subject area as “BP-Business Park” is conceptually consistent with <br />the mix of uses and stated goals described in the maps and text of the 2001 Master Plan. <br />Mr. Stark further outlined sub-areas within the subject area, identified in the 2001 Master <br />Plan as “Opportunity Areas 1, 2, 3 and 5,” on the table identified as “Exhibit C.” Mr. Stark <br />also reviewed the seven (7) broad policies, ten (10) goals and policies of the 2001 Master <br />Plan, and twenty-four (24) renewal strategies, all included in the staff report. Staff further <br />concluded that no aspect of the applicant’s proposal was identified as being in conflict with <br />these areas, with “Exhibit D” of the staff report providing an analysis of the manner in which <br />the proposal addresses the goals of the 2001 Master Plan. <br />Right-of Way/Easement Vacation <br />Mr. Paschke reviewed, in detail, the right-of-way and easement vacations portions of the <br />proposal for Twin Lakes west, as outlined in Sections 6.1 – 6.4 of the staff report. Mr. <br />concept <br />Paschke noted that the proposal was in form at this time, and would be further <br />refined through ongoing environmental review prior to the final development plan going <br />before the City Council for review and consideration. Mr. Paschke noted that the Planning <br /> <br />