My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
050306_VB_Minutes
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Variance Board
>
Minutes
>
2006
>
050306_VB_Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 3:40:25 PM
Creation date
2/6/2007 11:28:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Variance Board
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
5/3/2006
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Chair Bakeman opened the hearing and requested that Associate Planner Bryan Lloyd <br />provide a verbal summary of the project report dated May 5, 2006. <br />Lloyd provided the background on the VARIANCE request indicating that the Brown <br />driveway at 3086 South Owasso Boulevard lies 24 feet from the property line adjacent to <br />an intersection street (corner lot). Corner lots require a minimum driveway setback of 30 <br />feet (Section 703.04) thus the request is for a 6-foot variance. <br />Lloyd indicated that similar circumstances/hardships apply to this VARIANCE as did in <br />the other two - staff concluded no reasonable alternatives exist and no impact on general <br />health, safety, and welfare of neighborhood. Staff recommends approval of the 6-foot <br />VARIANCE. <br />Property owner indicated they would like to keep a tree that would be lost and that if the <br />driveway were replaced to Code it would end up near the home’s living room. <br />Member Doherty moved, seconded by Member Boerigter, to approve a 6-foot <br />VARIANCE to Section 703.04 of the Roseville City Code, based on the comments in <br />Section 3 of the project report dated May 3, 2006. <br />Ayes: 3 Nays: 0 Abstain: 0 <br />Motion Carried: 3 to 0. <br />Chair Bakeman explained the process and appeals for the decision. <br />Adjourn: <br /> 5:55 p.m. <br />Page 5 of 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.