Laserfiche WebLink
<br />HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION MINUTES <br />TUESDAY, JANUARY 8, 2002 <br /> <br />Call to Order <br />Thelma McKenzie called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. <br /> <br />Roll Call <br />Thelma McKenzie, Rita Stanoch, Stephen Smith, Howard Wagner, Phillip Crump, Mark <br />Chapin, Steve Zorn, Larry Voeller, and Todd Anderson <br /> <br />Student Member Present: Hannah Neprash <br /> <br />Others Present: Christine Butterfield <br /> <br />Approval of Minutes <br />Anderson moved and Stanoch seconded the approval of the minutes of September 11, <br />2001, October 9, 2001 and November 14, 2001. All Ayes <br /> <br />I. Introduction of New Members <br />New Members Todd Anderson, Mark Chapin, Steve Zorn and Larry V oe1ler were <br />introduced. <br /> <br />II. Essav Contest <br />Thelma noted the criteria for grading the essays was based upon how well the students <br />responded to the question. Phillip noted that the realistic nature of response was <br />important too. Steve suggested that each member throw in the top two essays. All <br />members ranked essays from 1 - 10. <br /> <br />Rita motioned to un-formalize the process. Todd seconded. <br /> <br />Larry Voeller proposed that each person review division ofthe essays and offer their top <br />3 -4. <br /> <br />The criteria would be on a scale of 1 - 10 equally weighed: <br />1. _ practicality of solution/creativity <br />2. _ grammar/quality of writing <br />3. _ relation to assignment/answer question <br /> <br />Rita suggested that the Commission add instructions to the process. Howard noted some <br />schools were participating and some were not. Mark Chapin asked what the purpose of <br />