My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2007_Human Rights Comm Minutes
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Human Rights Commission
>
Minutes
>
2007 Minutes
>
2007_Human Rights Comm Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 3:41:06 PM
Creation date
5/25/2007 11:41:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Human Rights Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
1/1/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />\ <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />to become more responsive to diversity. For teachers, this means examining pedagogy and <br />curriculum, as well as expectations and interaction patterns with students. It means looking <br />honestly at outcome data and creating new strategies designed to serve the students whom <br />current instruction is not reaching. For school leaders, this often means facing the limits of their <br />own knowledge and skills and becoming colearners with teachers to find ways to transform <br />classroom practices. <br /> <br />In Loudoun County Public Schools, outside Washington, D.C., teachers and school leaders are <br />taking this work seriously. One of the fastest-growing school systems in the United States, <br />Loudoun County is experiencing rapid increases in racial, cultural, linguistic, and economic <br />diversity on its eastern edge, closer to the city, while remaining more monocultural to the west. Six <br />of Loudoun's most diverse schools have formed leadership teams to promote the following <br />essential elements of culturally responsive teaching (CRT): <br /> <br />· Forming authentic and caring relationships with students. <br /> <br />· Using curriculum that honors each student's culture and life experience. <br /> <br />· Shifting instructional strategies to meet the diverse learning needs of students. <br /> <br />· Communicating respect for each student's intelligence. <br /> <br />· Holding consistent and high expectations for all learners. (Gay, 2000; Ladson-Billings, <br />1994; McKinley, 2005; Shade, Kelly, & Oberg, 1997) <br /> <br />CRT teams vary in size and membership but usually include principals, assistant principals, <br />counselors, lead teachers, specialists, and, in some cases, parents. In addition to engaging deeply <br />in the phases outlined above, these teams have begun to work with their broader school faculties <br />to transform instruction. At Loudoun County's Sugarland Elementary, teacher members of the <br />CRT team have designed student-based action research projects. They selected individual <br />students from their most academically challenged demographic groups and then used the <br />principles of CRT to plan new interventions to engage these students and track their progress. <br /> <br />In one action research project, a 5th grade teacher focused on a Latino student, an English <br />language learner who "couldn't put two sentences together, let alone write the five-paragraph <br />essay that is required to pass our 5th grade assessment." The teacher's first reaction was to ask, <br />"How was this student allowed to slip by all these years without learning anything beyond 2nd <br />grade writing skills?" When the teacher launched her CRT project, however, her perspective <br />became more proactive. She realized that she couldn't just deliver the 5th grade curriculum-she <br />had to meet this student where he was. She built a personal connection with the student, learned <br />about his family culture and interests (a fascination with monkeys was a major access point), and <br />used this relationship to reinforce his academic development. The student responded to her high <br />expectations and passed his 5th grade writing assessment. And after missing its No Child Left <br />Behind compliance goals in past years, Sugarland recently achieved adequate yearly progress for <br />all subgroups in its highly diverse student population. <br /> <br />This phase requires a crucial paradigm shift, in which teachers and other school professionals stop <br />blaming students and their families for gaps in academic achievement. Instead of pointing fingers, <br />educators in Loudoun schools are placing their energies where they will have the most impact-in <br />changing their own attitudes, beliefs, expectations, and practices. I frequently ask teachers and <br />school leaders, "Of all the many factors that determine school success for our students, where can <br />we as educators have the most influence?" After educators participate in the work outlined here, <br />the answer is always, "Changing ourselves." <br /> <br />Phase 5: Engaging the Entire School Community <br /> <br />Changing demographics have profound implications for all levels and functions of the school <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.