My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2007-02-27_PWETC_Minutes
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Minutes
>
200x
>
2007
>
2007-02-27_PWETC_Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/22/2010 10:38:48 AM
Creation date
6/7/2007 8:22:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
2/27/2007
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Ms. McGeehee said she talked to the EQB Board, and they said it is <br />acceptable for the Director of Public Works to ask for an Environmental <br />Assessment Worksheet (EAW), which she thinks is necessary. She said <br />she needs more detail to determine capacity. Member Neprash asked if <br />the college would be willing to do an EA W. Mr. Humphries said he <br />hasn't been through that before so would have to see what is involved but <br />would look into it. Mr. Humphries asked why this would be triggered on <br />the Northwestern Campus, is it a general practice for other applications. <br />Deb Bloom said that there are regulations in place that could require the <br />assessment, or if a petition of 25 signatures is obtained. She said staff <br />could sit down with the city attorney to see if the assessment is warranted. <br /> <br />Member Neprash said he had done a back calculation on the ratio between <br />impervious and the total site. The City has a standard of 25%, and his <br />calculation was 24%. He asked that the college do their own calculation, <br />and if they came up as close, they should state that in their report. <br /> <br />Member Neprash brought up the green roofs in the report that were linked <br />with parking ramps. He asked that they adjust the language to include <br />green roofs on the field house or the dorm instead. Mr. McLarnon said the <br />green roofs have been removed from the plan since they can meet their <br />requirements in other ways. <br /> <br />Member Neprash said in the 2003 master plan they have an expensive <br />budget that is very detailed, but storm water requirements have changed <br />since it was prepared. He wanted a larger amount set aside to cover these <br />new costs. Mr. Humphries said they've been using current day numbers, <br />and this is just the planning stage. Member Neprash requested that they <br />look closely at what the costs will be in the next 10 years. <br /> <br />Member Neprash said he thought neighbors were concerned about noise <br />from the new dormitory. Duane Schwartz said that the Planning <br />Commission would be covering those issues. <br /> <br />9. United Properties Senior Housing Proposal <br /> <br />Deb Bloom presented background on this item. <br /> <br />10. Future Agenda Topics for 2007 <br /> <br />Chair DeBenedet had wanted to discuss future topics. Since he wasn't in <br />attendance, this topic was continued to the next meeting. <br /> <br />Page 6 of7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.