My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006-11-28_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Agendas and Packets
>
200x
>
2006
>
2006-11-28_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/22/2010 4:15:13 PM
Creation date
6/7/2007 9:51:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
11/28/2006
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
45
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />John Stark, Community Development Director <br />City of Roseville <br /> <br />November 17, 2006 <br />Page 14 <br /> <br />The analysis results shown in Table 4 represent the level of service operations at each of the key <br />intersections with reasonable/feasible recommended improvements. It is evident that under year <br />2030 Scenario 1A build conditions, four intersections continue to operate at undesirable LOS E <br />or worse. This is due to the limitations placed on the recommended improvements <br />(reasonable/feasible versus unconstrained improvements). <br /> <br />Ramsey County staff has indicated that no additional improvements will be made to County <br />Road C and its intersection nodes. However, geometric improvements are needed at a number of <br />its intersections in order to improve operations under both scenarios. Without the recommended <br />improvements, these intersections are expected to operate worse than the undesirable conditions <br />stated under Scenarios 1A and lB. The intersection of County Road C/Snelling Avenue will <br />continue to operate at an undesirable LOS F with the recommended improvements. The amount <br />of conflicting volume forecast at this intersection is too heavy to manage under year 2030 build <br />conditions. Operational improvements are limited without a total reconstruction and grade- <br />separation at this intersection. <br /> <br />Table 4 <br />Year 2030 P.M. Peak Hour Capacity Analysis <br />Level of Service Results <br /> <br /> Level of Service <br />Intersection Scenario lA Scenario IB <br />Long Lake Road at 1-35W SB Ramos C C <br />Long Lake Road at County Road C C C <br />County Road C at Cleveland A venue E (60 sec.) (1) D <br />County Road C at Fairview Avenue E (70 sec.) (I) D <br />County Road C at Snelling A venue F (160 sec.) (I) F (80 sec.) (I) <br />Snelling A venne at County Road C2 E (70 sec.) (I) D <br />Snelling A venue at Lydia A venne D D(2) <br />Cleveland Avenue at 1-35W NB Ramps D D <br />Cleveland A venue at County Road C2 B B <br />County Road D at Cleveland Avenue D D <br />County Road D at 1-35W NB Ramps C C <br />County Road D at Fairview Avenue C C <br />Fairview Avenue at Lydia Avenue D D <br />Fairview A venue at Terrace Drive D D(2) <br /> <br />(I) Value shown in parenthesis represents the average delay per vehicle. <br />m LOS result is near the C/D threshold. <br /> <br />Recommended Improvements for Scenarios 1A and 16 <br /> <br />Please note that the recommended improvements listed below, unless noted specifically for <br />Scenario lA, apply to both Scenarios lA and lB. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.