2006-11-28_PWETC_AgendaPacket - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

John Stark, Commnnity Development Director City of Rose vi lie November 17,2006 Page 24 Table 8 Year 2006 Traffic Noise Analysis - Daytime Difference Difference between Year between Year 2030 Build 2030 Build Year 2030 Scenario IA Year 2030 Scenario IB Existing Build Scenario and Year 2006 Build Scenario and Year 2006 (Year 20(6) IA Existing IB Existing Receptor LlO LSD LlO LSD LlO LSD LlO LSD LlO L;o Rl 68 60 69 61 1 1 69 61 1 I R2 70 63 71 64 1 1 70 64 0 1 R3 71 64 73 67 2 3 73 66 2 2 State 65 60 65 60 65 60 Standards - - - - Table 9 Y 2006 T ff N' A N' htt' ear ra IC olse mlllysls - ICH Ime Difference Difference between Year between Year 2030 Build 2030 Build Year 2030 Scenario IA Year 2030 Scenario I B Existing Build Scenario and Year 2006 Build Scenario and Year 2006 (Year 2006) IA Existin" 1B Existing Receptor LlO LSD LlO LSD LlO LSD LlO LSD L,O L50 Rl 63 53 66 57 3 4 65 56 2 3 R2 65 57 65 57 0 0 65 57 0 0 R3 67 58 69 61 2 3 69 61 2 3 State 55 50 55 50 55 50 Standards - - - - Minnesota Statute 116.07, Subd. 2a. states that municipal and county roads are exempt from state noise standards, except for those roadways where full control of access has been acquired and for roads in the cities of Minneapolis and St. Paul. The Twin Lakes AUAR adjacent roadways (e.g., Fairview A venue, Cleveland Avenue) are City or County roads without full control of access (e.g., direct driveway connections) and are exempt from State noise standards per Minnesota Statute. Therefore, no traffic noise mitigation is proposed. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Based on this analysis, the following comments and recommendations are offered for your consideration: Traffic Operations Analysis . Under existing p.m. peak hour conditions, all key intersections operate at an acceptable overall LOS D or better with existing traffic controls and geometric layout, except for the intersection of County Road C/Snelling Avenue. This intersection currently operates at an undesirable LOS F.