My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
res_1793
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Resolutions
>
01xxx
>
1700
>
res_1793
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:06:00 AM
Creation date
4/23/2005 4:26:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Resolutions
Resolution #
1793
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I2vve /Ifl <br /> <br />Extract of Minutes of Meeting <br />of Village Council <br />Village of Roseville <br />Ramsey County, Minnesota <br />April 10, 1967 <br /> <br />Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting <br /> <br />of the Village Council of the Village of Roseville, Minnesota, <br />was held in the Village Hall in said Village on Monday, the 10th <br />day of April, 1967, at 7:30 o'clock p.m. <br /> <br />The fo llowing members were present: t'.1ayor Cedarholm, <br />Trustees Curley, Gocxlrich and Grauel <br /> <br />and the following were absent: Trustee Shields <br />The Village Manager presented an affidavit showing pub- <br />lication of notice of hearing on proposed Improvement No. 66-26 <br />in accordance with the resolution adopted March 13, 1967, which <br />affidavit was examined and found to be satisfactory and was <br /> <br />directed to be filed by the Manager. The Village Manager also <br /> <br />exhibited a Certificate of Mailing N~tice of Hearing to all <br /> <br />affected property owners, which certificate was examined and <br /> <br />found to be satisfactory and was directed to be filed by the <br /> <br />Manager. <br /> <br />The Mayor then directed the Manager to read the description <br />of the general nature and estimated cost of the proposed <br />improvement and the area proposed tc be assessed therefor, as <br />stated in the published notice of hearing. After reading of <br />the notice, all persons present were afforded opportunity to <br />be heard, and the names and addresses of the persons appearing <br /> <br />and heard by the Council, and the substance of the views <br /> <br />presented by them were as follows: <br /> <br />No one appeared. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.