My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2007_0618
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2007
>
CC_Minutes_2007_0618
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/1/2007 12:34:17 PM
Creation date
8/1/2007 12:34:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
6/18/2007
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
52
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, June 18, 2007 <br />Page 16 <br />copy of the post card notice and map indicating the notice area. Mr. <br />Stark further reviewed the status of staff review; the original project <br />submitted in January of 2007, and the significant difference in project <br />revisions brought to the Planning Commission, and brought forth for <br />consideration tonight, with the site plan received by staff on May 21, <br />2007 deemed by staff to be complete, with the 60-day review period <br />initiated at that time. <br />Councilmember Ihlan questioned whether any environmental reviews <br />had been completed for this project. <br />Mr. Stark responded that other than a traffic analysis, there had not <br />been an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) or Environ- <br />mental Impact Study (EIS) ordered, as it had been determined that the <br />project didn't meet those requirement thresholds. <br />City Engineer Debra Bloom referenced the provisions of the City's <br />Shoreland Ordinance (§ 1016) and staff's rationale and review of the <br />project related to wetland buffers. <br />Councilmember Ihlan noted that the PWET Commission discussion <br />indicated further wetland mitigation review was needed before resolu- <br />tion. <br />Ms. Bloom reviewed setbacks on the south side wetland; current and <br />projected stormwater runoff; and quality of the wetland in the north- <br />west corner, currently housing a car, tires, and excess debris) and its <br />significant degradation. Ms. Bloom indicated that it was staff's rec- <br />ommendation that the setback be preserved from other wetland areas, <br />and mitigate the adjacent site next to the degraded wetland, with fur- <br />ther refinement between now and the final development plan. <br />Councilmember Ihlan sought additional staff rationale for the park ac- <br />cess road at the developer's expense. <br />Mr. Stark reviewed the history and lack of a formal access agreement <br />or right-of--way in place to access the City park, despite the Langton <br />Lake Park Master Plan in place for it since 1986, with access only via <br />a "gentleman's agreement." <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.