My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2007_0618
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2007
>
CC_Minutes_2007_0618
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/1/2007 12:34:17 PM
Creation date
8/1/2007 12:34:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
6/18/2007
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
52
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, June 18, 2007 <br />Page 17 <br />Councilmember Ihlan had additional questions regarding preserving <br />more green space through a formal access agreement for the park <br />rather than the proposed access road; and whether the City needed <br />more senior housing, especially when it required rezoning of a prop- <br />erty. <br />Mr. Stark advised that, when staff reviewed land use items, whether <br />more "senior housing" was needed in the community was not a con- <br />sideration as a standard in determining the land use issue. <br />City Attorney Jay Squires advised that determining whether more sen- <br />ior housing was needed was more judicial in nature and the land use <br />issues were not determined by market demand, however, they could <br />be a limited part of the City Council's legislative-based policy deci- <br />sion in making a determination whether there was a need for the use <br />allowed by the new zoning. <br />Councilmember Kough questioned whether the developer would be <br />asked for a park dedication or money in lieu of land. Councilmember <br />Kough praised the developer for their previous projects in Roseville; <br />their construction and management of their facilities. Councilmember <br />Kough offered his support of this project and its concept in its en- <br />tirety. <br />Mr. Stark advised that staff was recommending that this go to the <br />Parks and Recreation Commission for their determination and rec- <br />ommendation to the City Council as to land dedication or money in <br />lieu of park land. <br />Councilmember Pust questioned why the Langton Lake Park Master <br />Plan had not been incorporated into the Comprehensive Plan, recog- <br />nizing that it served the City well in this case, but seemed unusual. <br />Mr. Stark advised that staff had attempted to research the rationale for <br />the inconsistency, but had been unsuccessful in making a determina- <br />tion. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.