My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2007_0618
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2007
>
CC_Minutes_2007_0618
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/1/2007 12:34:17 PM
Creation date
8/1/2007 12:34:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
6/18/2007
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
52
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, June 18, 2007 <br />Page 21 <br />Mr. Brian Carey provided comment on the success of their previous <br />Roseville senior housing projects; existing waiting list of thirty peo- <br />ple; and their enthusiasm to work on another project in Roseville. <br />Mr. Carey advised that the current plan was solely in response to the <br />request by staff and the Park and Recreation Commission to provide <br />access to Langton Lake Park, with the developer's preference being <br />the original plan that provided transition for single-family homes by <br />including the twin homes south of the co-op building. Mr. Carey ad- <br />vised that if the City Council thought the first plan was more appro- <br />priate, the developer would be willing to work with the City on that <br />option. <br />Councilmember Ihlan suggested that the City Council consider an ex- <br />tension of the 60-day land use review, opining that there seemed to be <br />a huge number of policy questions and environmental issues that <br />needed to be considered, and additional information provided to the <br />City Council before they could make a decision. <br />Councilmember Pust questioned the intent of the developer and their <br />preferred design layout; and whether they were presenting this site <br />plan, or wanted to return to their previous design; and whether the de- <br />veloper should seek to delay Council action on the proposed site plan <br />before them tonight to allow time for the developer and staff to work <br />out more details. <br />Mr. Carey clarified that, while the developer would have preferred a <br />Study Session with the City Council as the plans developed, the de- <br />veloper was before the City Council tonight requesting approval of the <br />plan before them with staff support, rather than delaying the project <br />further. <br />Mr. Hall noted that, by eliminating the twin homes for the project, and <br />compromising by including the access road to the park, the developer <br />had significantly reduced their profit potential by approximately $1 <br />million. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.