My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2007_0618
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2007
>
CC_Minutes_2007_0618
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/1/2007 12:34:17 PM
Creation date
8/1/2007 12:34:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
6/18/2007
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
52
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, June 18, 2007 <br />Page 27 <br />Recess <br />Mayor Klausing recessed the meeting at 8:53 p.m. and reconvened at 9:03 p.m. <br />d. Planned Unit Development and Rezoning - Consider a Planned <br />Unit Development and Rezoning of 2700 Cleveland Avenue for <br />Cent Ventures (PF07-021) <br />City Planner Thomas Paschke reviewed the Cent Ventures and Am- <br />West Development request to place a 5,000 square foot restaurant <br />near the southwest corner of the property; a 4-story, 120-unit hotel <br />near the rear (east property line); parking adjacent to Cleveland Ave- <br />nue near the restaurant and between the restaurant and hotel, with a <br />small parking field adjacent to the Mount Ridge Road right-of--way; <br />and construction of a temporary right-in/right-out in the northwest <br />corner of the parcel, with a permanent access to be constructed when <br />Twin Lakes Parkway completed along the southern boundary of the <br />subject parcel. <br />Mr. Paschke reviewed rationale for staff concerns and their ultimate <br />recommendation for denial: no traffic study; problematic traffic flow; <br />not a use staff was supportive of; and a number of components of the <br />Site Design that were not consistent with the Master Plan and design <br />standards necessary to provide clear direction related to this proposal. <br />Mr. Paschke advised that while staff was supportive of the proposed <br />uses, and that they were supported by the Twin Lakes Master Plan and <br />Comprehensive Plan, staff found numerous items during their review <br />that had not allowed them to provide adequate direction and analysis <br />for the Planning Commission and City Council; and that those ,items <br />were still pending receipt from the developer. Those items were de- <br />tailed and outlined in the staff report dated June 18, 2007, and were <br />related to traffic flows and impacts, functionality of the site; stormwa- <br />ter management and shared parking considerations; and potential traf- <br />fic considerations and projections related to future roadways, includ- <br />ing Twin Lakes Parkway and an extension of Mount Ridge Road. Mr. <br />Paschke noted review became problematic with single-site develop- <br />ment and unknown infrastructure impacts (i.e., looping of water <br />mains; tying into sanitary sewer; and utilization of public infrastruc- <br />ture). <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.