CC_Minutes_2007_0716 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

pity C®ncil Study Sessi®n l~ouday, ~Tuiy 16, 2047 Page 26 Twin Lakes Business Park AUAR Update, process, scenarios, sum- mary impacts and mitigation strategies, and next steps. Ms. Schlicting focused on what was different from the first update. "Next Steps" were Identified by Ms. Schlicting as: ~ City Council determination that the AUAR update is complete and accurate and authorizing thirty-day comment period (10-day by statute}; ~ AUAR update 30-day comment period; ~ Public Comment Meeting -August 20, 2007; Response to objections, if filed; and ~ Adoption of the Twin Lakes Business Park AUAR Update. Mayor Klausing noted the tithe again, and ongoing discussion of this item only past 11:00 p.m., was approved by consensus. Discussion included extended public comment time from 10 to 30 days; pro-rated cost allotment of mitigation strategies as identified per City Policy for a condition to future land use applications for financial participation determined by their use, traffic generation, etc. Councilmember Ihlan questioned whether the draft update included consideration of pollution contamination studies done in connection with the previous developer and Eminent Domain proceedings. Mr. Schlicting advised that the appendix referenced the studies; how- ever, didn't consider them above and beyond typical requirements of development application requirements and state and federal remedia- tion laws. Staff confirmed that they didn't have access to the documents, but that they were held by a private developer. City Attorney Anderson clarified that the comment period for agen- cies having regulatory authority ran from publication; and that general public comment was not considered by the Environmental Quality Board (EQB). Councilmember Pust asked, and Ms. Schlicting clarified, that to- night's document indicated cumulative changes.