My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2007_0716
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2007
>
CC_Minutes_2007_0716
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/1/2007 1:48:05 PM
Creation date
8/1/2007 1:42:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
7/16/2007
Meeting Type
Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
101
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
uses, such as soil contamination or abandoned storage tanks, or proximity to nearby hazardous liquid or <br />gas pipelines. <br />The IaT~7d arse is cull°ently =oned indztst~°ial and is a par°k~ing facilit}1 for cover the load trailers. The site <br />has been consistently used for this pialhose since its inception iTi the 195a's ~~~hen it ~~~as a farm. Ot7~er° than <br />the small steel structure can the pr°opert~~ and the ~7~ostly paved sznfaee no other development has accused <br />since it ~i~as f~~st constructed. The curs°ent use is consistent ti~>>ith the zrse of tTae surrozrnding properties, <br />ho~i~ever, the City I~as designated this area for redevelapn~lent and has for ~r~cn7y years zrndertaken steps to <br />pro~7~aote its development consistent ~i~ith tl~e comprehensive plan. The proposed a.~se is consistent ~i~iih the <br />Cit~l's naastel° and corr~prehensive plan. The proposed development is consistent ~~~~ith other recent <br />develop~raents tJ7at have been undel~talzen bringing Chase properties il~~ to confo~°mance with the <br />corrzprel~ensive plan. !None of the adjacent properties are currently proposing redevelopment so it is <br />unlc~~own horn this project rni11 relate to those improve~r~ents i~~hen, and if, they a~°e co~rrpleted.. <br />There are no In~o~~~n environmental Jza~ar°ds ~~lithin the p~°opertJ~. The general area has been the sz~bject of <br />intense inspection for enviromnental concerns ~>>ith no specific action being required at dais time. It is not <br />knoi~~ to this applicant the extent of any contamination of any adjace~~t proper°ry. i~irith regard to the <br />proposed developl~ient no studies have reisealed any enviromnental or geotechnicaJ issues requiring action. <br />10. ~€~ver t3Tpes. Estimate the acreage of tl~e site with each of the follo~~~ing cover types before and after <br />development: <br />before ter ~~i'®re te~- <br />Types 1-8 wetlands Lawnllandscaping <br />lYone 1~Tone 22,OSb sf. 34,736- rafter <br />`~edicration of tapprox:inarately 3, 000 for• 1~® <br />~%~~ooded/forest hnpelvious sui-faces <br />None 1°done 126,336 sf. 114,000 sf. <br />Brush/Grassland Other (describe) <br />Cropland <br />krone 1lrone 'T®'T~ 3.42 <br />If before and After totals are not equal, explain why: Right of Way (ROW) dedication will reduce the <br />total land size. <br />11. Fish, wildlife and ec®1®gically sensitive res®urces <br />a. Identify fish and wildlife resources and. habitats on or near the site and describe how they would be <br />affected by the project. Describe any measures to be taken to minimize or avoid. impacts. <br />!None. The site is currently n7ostly covered ~~~ith asphalt sup face. In 2006 the Minnesota Department of <br />l~ratural Resources ~~~as asked to determine if there i~~ere "any rare plant or animal species or other <br />significant natural features... " i~~ithin the genes°al Tulin Lakes area. They repor°ted 1 kno~~rn occurrence <br />of a jumping spider, but not at this pr•opert)~, and concluded about developn~rent ~~~ithin Twin Lakes "I <br />do not belie~1e it will affect this rar°e feature. " <br />b. Are any state-listed (endangered, tlu-eatened or special concern) species, rare plant communities or <br />other sensitive ecological resources such as native prairie habitat, colonial waterbird nesting colonies <br />or regionally rare plant communities on or near the site? Yes X I~To <br />If yes, describe the resource and how it would be affected by the project. Indicate if a site survey of the <br />resources has been conducted and describe the results. If the DNR Natural Heritage and Nongame <br />Research program has been contacted give the correspondence reference number: Yes 20010827- <br />0004. Describe measures to minimize or avoid adverse impacts. I~TOne at this property. <br />12. Physical impacts ®n water resources. Wi11 the project involve the physical or hydrologic alteration <br />- dredging; filling, stream diversion, outfall structure, diking, and impomldment - of any surface <br />waters such as a la]{e, pond, wetland, stream or drainage ditch? _Yes _X No <br />If yes, identify water resource affected and give the DNR Protected Waters Inventory number(s) if the <br />water resources affected are on the PWL .Describe alternatives considered and proposed <br />mitigation measures to minimize impacts. <br />13. grater use. Will the project involve installation or abandomnent of any water wells, connection to or <br />changes in any public water supply or appropriation of any ground or surface water (including <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.