020707_VB_Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Variance Board Meeting Minutes – Wednesday, February 07, 2007 Page 2 site plan reviewed as part of the variance process; previous points for denial based on no specific site plan provided for the home tied to the variance application; and this application including a specific encroachment tied to a specific setback allowance or deviation from the code; and hardship criteria not created by the applicant. Applicant, Brad Welp, spoke to advise the Board that the proposed plan for a modest, traditional style home as presented was what he was intending to build, with Variance Board approval, and advised that he was receptive to the proposed language as suggested by the Board. Mr. Todd Ilif, representing current property owners Mr. and Mrs. Charles Weleczki, advised that this was an entirely new proposal, and the purchase agreement was pending, contingent upon approval of the Variance. Mr. Ilif spoke in support of the request. Public Comment Mike Radovich, 1820 Dale Court Mr. Radovich spoke in support of this variance request; opining that the plan was preferable to the open-ended variance request previously sought. Mr. Radovich requested that the Board include language as proposed; and advised that he had spoken with several other surrounding neighbors who seem expressed no major concerns with this particular variance request. Acting Chair Boerigter closed the Public Hearing. MOTION Member Bakeman moved, seconded by Member Wozniak to adopt Variance Board Resolution No. 52 entitled, “A Resolution APPROVING Variances to §1004 (Residential Districts) of the Roseville City Code for Brad Welp for the Property at 1828 Dale Court (PF07-005);” for the request for a fourteen foot (14’) VARIANCE from the required front yard setback and a five foot (5’) VARIANCE from the required rear yard setback, to allow the construction of the proposed residential structure on the property at 1828 Dale Court; based on comments and findings in Section 5 conditions detailed in Section 6 of the staff report dated February 7, 2007; and amended to stipulate that the variances were granted based on the site plan submitted and reviewed by the Variance Board at this meeting. Commissioner Bakeman expressed her enthusiasm for resolution of this issue and the new plan as presented, recognizing the triangular lot issues complicating the situation; and welcomed the applicant to Roseville. Acting Chair Boerigter spoke in support of the motion; opining the benefit to the property and its reasonable fit and consistency with the neighborhood. Ayes: 3 Nays: 0 Motion carried. Acting Chair Boerigter advised the applicant of the appeal process timeframe. b. PLANNING FILE 07-008 Request by Lexington Professional Building, 1790 Lexington Avenue, for a VARIANCE to Roseville City Code,§1009 (Sign Regulations) to allow the replacement of an existing non-conforming, freestanding sign with a new freestanding sign, one foot from the front property line.