CC_Minutes_2007_0723 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Regular City C®uncll Meeting 1Vi®nday, July 23, 2007 Page 11 City was defending its interests throughout the process, however un- fortunate and costly that defense became. Councilmember Pust concurred with advice of City Attorney Reuvers that it was now in the best interest of the City to settle with the devel- oper, rather than to continue litigation and additional attorney fees. Councilmember Pust concurred with Councilmember Ihlan that the taxpayers should hold their City Council representatives accountable in this and all issues before it; however, noted that every action taken by the City Council had been done on majority vote, even though made up of different individuals who were voting in what their opin- ion was the best interest of the City. Councilmember Pust opined that perhaps additional lawsuits would be forthcoming from special inter- est groups again; however, noted that such litigation did impact their neighbor's tax dollar as well. Councilmember Pust further opined that it was time to get over it, bring closure to the project, and move for- ward as a City Council and a community; and to determine as a com- munity what was best for the Twin Lakes Redevelopment area; and what prop®sal provides investment in the community. Councilmember Ihlan responded to her perceived inaccuracies of Councilmember Pust's statement and historical review of the process to-date. Councilmember Ihlan noted that the Friends of Twin Lakes litigation had already been initiated when the Council majority voted to sign the development agreement, despite her reiterated words of caution from some public comments and her personal concerns about doing so. Councilmember Ihlan opined that one vote that had been consistent throughout the process had been that of Mayor Klausing voting to go forward. Councilmember Ihlan further addressed the Council majority vote to enter into C~uick Take Eminent Domain action, and her consistent votes in opposition, along with Councilmember Kough. Council- member Ihlan provided rationale for her opposition due to the uncer- tainty of the situation, and risk to the City. Councilmember Ihlan pro- vided her interpretation of the City's contractual obligations regarding eminent domain; and environmental review issues at issue. Council- member Ihlan opined that it was inappropriate for the Council maj or-