My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2007_0723
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2007
>
CC_Minutes_2007_0723
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/12/2007 11:59:30 AM
Creation date
9/12/2007 11:59:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
7/23/2007
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
69
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
egular City C®uncil eating <br />®nday, July 23, 2007 <br />Page 3 <br />market value, and were removed from the tax rolls. Mr. Neprash <br />opined that this would be one of the few times the City would have <br />sufficient leverage to negotiate with the College; and that there was <br />every reason to believe that the college would acquire additional off- <br />campus properties over the next 10-20 years, further impacting the <br />City's tax base. <br />Councilmember Pust questioned if Mr. Neprash thought deliberations, <br />conclusions and recommendations at the PV'VET level would have <br />been different if comments were made available. <br />Mr. Neprash opined that, personally he believed it would have, just <br />the sheer weight of the comments and their substance, including the <br />nature of the entities providing comment. <br />i alag a, 3 ®rew®® a e <br />Mr. Callaghan noted that he lived directly across Little Johanna from <br />the College; and expressed his disappointment with the general nature <br />of the comments, rather than lack of specifics from the College in <br />their responses; opining that they were very incomplete and vague. <br />Mr. Callaghan commented on the various plans presented throughout <br />the review; and questioned which site plan was accurate; specific lo- <br />cation of the proposed ball fields and field house; whether the ball <br />field was proposed to be moved adjacent to Lydia and potential safety <br />impacts to traffic along Lydia and homes in that area; and the existing <br />significant sound buffer of trees in place on the east side of the prop- <br />erty and the questioned the intent for those trees. <br />1Vlayor Klausing reminded Mr. Callaghan that all plans presented and <br />reworked by the applicant were in concept stage at this point; and that <br />tree preservation; landscaping; and building location would be com- <br />pleted in accordance with City Code and permitting processes and <br />monitored by staff accordingly. <br />Mr. Callaghan reiterated his concerns with potential loss of existing <br />forested areas of the campus; addressed existing and potential noise <br />issues from the campus specific to sporting events, and impacts of any <br />significant tree buffers along the edge of the campus. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.