My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2007_0827
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2007
>
CC_Minutes_2007_0827
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/17/2007 12:06:10 PM
Creation date
9/17/2007 12:06:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
8/27/2007
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Minutes of 8/27/07 <br />Regular City Council Meeting <br />Page 25 <br />Councilmember Kough opined that in thinking about a moratorium, <br />he couldn't see how it would help the area. <br />Mr. Darrow clarified that two (2) formal applications had been sub- <br />mitted to-date. <br />Councilmember Kough asked that staff alert Councilmembers of in- <br />terest in parcels in the Twin Lakes area, rather than having to hear it <br />through the "grapevine." <br />Councilmember Roe noted that this had been previously requested of <br />staff. <br />Mr. Darrow advised that staff could keep Councilmembers advised of <br />such interest. <br />Councilmember Pust spoke in support of the benefits of community <br />planning, opining that running a process to get wide public input was <br />always a good idea and could avoid issues that had proven contentious <br />in the past. However, Councilmember Pust spoke in opposition to <br />negatively affecting of limiting use and rights of private property <br />owners. Councilmember Pust further opined that, if the City owned <br />the property, it would be a decision internally, but with the property <br />owned privately, and given threatened litigation already, it didn't <br />seem like good policy to establish a moratorium. Councilmember <br />Pust further opined that she was in full support of going full steam <br />ahead with community planning, but questioned the need fora mora- <br />torium to do that planning; and seemed to simply attempt to make it <br />easier for the Council to bring things to a halt to make decisions when <br />it was more convenient for them to do so, rather than being leaders <br />and doing that planning more immediately and not affecting private <br />property owner rights. <br />Mayor Klausing, on a personal note, advised that the Twin Lakes re- <br />development area had consumed a major part of his life over the last <br />five years; and clarified that the purpose of the previous moratorium <br />was not for property acquisition, but to provide for the majority City <br />Council-appointed stakeholder group to meet, and allow for a public <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.