My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2007_0827
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2007
>
CC_Minutes_2007_0827
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/17/2007 12:06:10 PM
Creation date
9/17/2007 12:06:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
8/27/2007
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
II. POLICY ISSUES RELATED TO THE P.U.D.B6 <br />COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION. <br />1. When is a plan not a plan? <br />If you have four possible scenarios, and also are willing to combine <br />elements of one plan with the other, do you have so many possible plans that you <br />wind up with no plan at all? Does the staff and city council majority want a <br />comprehensive land use plan that is so vague that anything they say is consistent <br />therewith gets approved by them? <br />In Mr. Stark's updated AUAR, there is no master pla~he merely shows <br />a Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designation Map as being the "master plan". <br />2. Shouldn't the Comprehensive Plan be "updated" simultaneously with the <br />AUAR update? Staff claims consistency with the existing comprehensive <br />plan, but to get there they re-defined the existing Master Plan to <br />their liking. <br />3. Is the P.U.D. B6 process a fair one? <br />Consider the land owners in Twin Lakes. <br />What property rights to they have? <br />The city apparently wants to attract another big bucks master developer, <br />instead of incremental projects (as per a newspaper quote of Mayor Klausing). <br />Are current land owners (in phase 1) in any bargaining position with <br />prospective buyers or developers? Meanwhile, what can they do with their <br />land? It's been unused for the most part for over a year, and cannot go back to <br />its original use. They must await some future developer making an offer to <br />buy. That could be many years. <br />6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.