CC_Minutes_2007_0813 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

a v•u. aaV rr a. v vvra.l al µ ~l~y --~~. a µµl a ivli\.~.1 1 a~.JJ Lti/LV11Gi1 1.114f1~'~ Jldtlb L/ I Q~'G 1 1 Vl GL > June 27 > I view Twin Lakes as the epitome of grand scheme city planning to micro manage > over 172 acres of developable land.? The B6 zone with a PUD planned unit > development placed our city staff in charge of micro managing all the details.? > How can you not see this as not exactly what Mr. Greenhut was complaining > about??Central Planning stifles.? ?Also, the B6 zone?took away land owners > rights to do what they want with their land.? They were only given the right to > continue to use their 1 and? so long as they didn't change uses.?I think the > city should have been sued for loss of value of their land.? Now that the land > has been vacant and unused for over a year,? those land owners are precluded > from reverting back to .that use.? They must conform to the B6 zone requirements. > Dan, sometimes I wonder if we live on the same planet.? Could you get more > specific in your comments?? Just how and why do you think Twin Lakes fits into > Mr. Greenhut's stated scheme of freedom for land owners to do what they want?? > Dan, everyone is naturally greedy and self centered.? It is the human > condition.? Wouldn't you want to increase your salary/compensation if you > could?? Corrupt is a different matter.? The Council needs to balance the demands > of employees against what's fair compared to the private sector.? How many of us > can match their health and retirement benefits?? What about outsourcing?? ; Are > you ready for that?? By the way, I'm not ready to fire good employees and > replace them with outsiders. > Al Sands > -----Original Message----- > From: ,. > Sent: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 3:08 pm > Subject: Re: Howt o Govern a City --St. Paul Pioneer Press Editorial Friday, > June 27 > A1, > ? > Here is a link to the original commentary from the Orange County Register.? > ? .y ,-~ - - „_ ... ._ _ , , ,-, ~ ~ ~ F ~' _ .. _. > _. ~ ..,~~ ~ ~ __ .r~:x~ > ? > I have to say that I read the piece in the PP on Friday, too, and came to a > completely different conclusion about how Roseville compares to the objectives > Mr. Greenhut sets forward.? Only if you buy into the notion that Roseville city > employees and officials?are self-centered, greedy, and corrupt could you > conclude that most of Mr. Greenhut's complaints apply to Roseville city > government.? http://webmail.aol.com/29047/aol/en-uslMail/PrintMessage.aspx 8/7/2007