My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2007_0813
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2007
>
CC_Minutes_2007_0813
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/17/2007 12:43:07 PM
Creation date
9/17/2007 12:36:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
8/13/2007
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
121
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 YY 4. 11V YYl V VVYVlll0. t.1L~' --U L. 1 0.U111V11GG1 11GJJ 1.iLL1LV110.11'11U0.~'~ JU11G G/ <br />> ? <br />> Interestingly, many of the notions that Mr. Greenhut espouses about freedom <br />from <br />> excessive control and creativity of land use are exactly what was being fought <br />> by opponents of Twin Lakes or by opponents of lot splits in Roseville.? I <br />wonder <br />> how those folks would respond to Mr. Greenhut's lassaiz-faire approach to <br />zoning <br />> controls? <br />> Regards, <br />> ? <br />> Dan Roe <br />> ? <br />> -------------- Original message -------------- <br />> From: esa*_c:'->;_ ~~~i:';a;;? . ccm <br />> The attached article appeared in the ST. Paul Pioneer Press last Friday.? I <br />> heartily agree with it's philosophy, opposite from the suffocating goals of <br />big <br />> time development this city embraces. <br />> You may wish to also read my comments on the Roseville Issues web site. <br />> Al Sands <br />> AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from <br />AOL <br />> at AOL.com. <br />> ? Of course we need a comprehensive plan to keep targets and costcos separate <br />> from residential areas.? That is the very purpose of a comprehensive plan, and <br />> the zoning codes that support and are consistent with the Comp Plan.?? Right <br />> now, most of Twin Lakes would be zoned "light industrial" were it not for the <br />B6 <br />> PUD designation.? Note that the B6 designation does not take effect until <br />there <br />> is an approved PUD,? Before Commers bo ught the Zndianhead site, someone else <br />> managed to get it re- zoned to commercial from industrial.?It doesn't fit <br />> in--doesn't belong there. ?I would be interested in learning?how that ever got <br />> rezoned to commercial in an otherwise industrial zoning area.? However, he <br />> doesn't have enough land there for a Costco. Even a Costco wouldn't want to be <br />> situated in the middle of an industrial manufacturing?area. <br />> ? To make my position clear to you, I would rescind the B6 zoning designation, <br />> abandon the PUD micromanaging approach, but amend the Comprehensive Plan to <br />zone <br />> the Twin Lakes area in a sensible land use approach.? Industrial is no longer <br />a <br /> <br />http://webmail.aol.com/29047/aoUen-us/Mail/PrintMessage.aspx 8/7/2007 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.