My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pm_070815
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
200x
>
2007
>
pm_070815
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/9/2007 11:53:56 AM
Creation date
10/9/2007 11:53:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Planning Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
8/15/2007
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Special
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Special Planning Commission Meeting <br />Minutes – Wednesday, August 15, 2007 <br />Page 5 <br /> <br />diverse and attractive employment options to encourage <br />Discussion related to <br />relocating in Roseville <br />included former communications from the City via “Business <br />Link” e-mails and its current obsolete status; lack of budgeted funds to pursue <br />additional communication opportunities; living wage issues; potential survey of <br />businesses and their expectations/needs of the City (i.e., access, safety); multi- <br />functionality and broad distribution desires of a business newsletter (i.e., educational <br />code enforcement items suited to businesses); new technologies (i.e., website) to <br />accomplish; availability, accuracy and cost of obtaining business data; and additional <br />public relations opportunities between the City and business community. <br /> <br />compatibility of ordinances with the needs of a diverse <br />Discussion related to <br />population <br /> included: educational aspects again based on ethnicities and cultural <br />issues related to design standards; increased diversity anticipated by 2025; and those <br />items that are appropriate or not appropriate in City Code in practical applications for <br />the broader community and urban areas. <br /> <br />It was the consensus of Commissioners that a priority item would be to support a <br />systematic and periodic code review, including potential code definition rewrites to <br />make them more understandable and to reflect current and potential future issues. <br /> <br />Considerable discussion was held regarding advantages and disadvantages, and <br />creation of a Roseville Chamber of Commerce <br />impacts in or more focus on <br />Roseville from the North Suburban Area Chamber of Commerce; partnerships <br />between the Roseville Visitor’s Association (RVA) and tapping into their existing <br />substantial resources and promotional opportunities; RVA’s promotion of the OVAL; <br />and the City’s participation and partnership in an active, rather than reactive role. <br /> <br />market analyses on economic and/or demographic trends and <br />Discussion on <br />benefits of each economic sector <br /> included: the value-added of such analyses; <br />market-driven economies with little ability of the City to dictate outcomes; land use, <br />zoning, and development related to economic trends; and benefits of specific <br />Roseville demographics provided in recent John Shardlow presentations. <br /> <br />incentives from the City to encourage master-planned areas or site <br />Discussion of <br />assembly rather than piecemeal development <br /> included: problems in the recent <br />Twin Lakes litigation due to inclusion of the Twin Lakes Master Plan in the <br />Comprehensive Plan; and corridor developments and master plan advantages. <br /> <br />ensuring that code enforcement officers had adequate <br />Discussion related to <br />resources, political support and authorizing ordinances <br /> offered strong support; <br />however, recognized the educational aspect again and systematic code reviews. <br /> <br />environmentally sustainable public facilities and properties <br />Discussion related to <br />included: opportunities for the City to actively and aggressively pursue shared <br />infrastructure with schools and other interactions; and the City taking the lead in <br />becoming a better facilitator in improving energy standards (i.e., study of city vehicle <br />needs, types, sizes and their energy consumption); identify new and innovative <br />resources; proactively seek grant funds for those initiatives; and a commitment by the <br />City to reduce their fuel consumption by 20%. <br /> <br />Given time constraints, additional items were discussed on more general terms, <br />recognizing that many items were duplicated or inter-related to other discussions <br />points already addressed. That discussion included: architectural amenities and <br />diversity in housing redesign; rental housing registration and/or licensing and <br />additional needs over the next twenty-five years given that much of the City’s housing <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.