My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pm_070815
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
200x
>
2007
>
pm_070815
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/9/2007 11:53:56 AM
Creation date
10/9/2007 11:53:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Planning Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
8/15/2007
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Special
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Special Planning Commission Meeting <br />Minutes – Wednesday, August 15, 2007 <br />Page 6 <br /> <br />stock is now 50 years old; point of sale home inspections to ensure safety and code <br />compliance; cultural and family considerations in current code regarding “granny flats” <br />in single-family homes; definition of “family;” neighborhood associations; <br />acknowledging that the more PUD’s issued the more obsolete a City’s zoning <br />ordinance becomes; basing developer requests and granting of PUD’s based on <br />specific hardships; benefits of design control for the City in granting PUD’s; and <br />updated codes to provide a stricter interpretation of the zoning ordinance and <br />providing more control and relevancy for the City. <br /> <br />c. Establish Priorities <br />HIGH PRIORITIES: <br />Commissioners, by consensus, listed the following items as <br />? <br />FACILITATE A DISCUSSION AND CONSENSUS ON RESIDENTIAL DENSITY <br /> <br />ISSUES; NOTING THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION SUPPORTS AREA- <br />SPECIFIC INCREASED RESIDENTIAL DENSITY <br />? <br />CODE ENFORCEMENT (i.e., NO PARKING ON GRASS; RENTAL HOUSING <br /> <br />REGISTRATION AND/OR LICENSING) <br />? <br />LANDSCAPING AND DESIGN STANDARDS (INCLUDING TREE <br /> <br />PRESERVATION) <br />? <br />SYSTEMATIC CODE REVIEW <br /> <br />? <br />COMMUNICATION AND EDUCATION OF EXISTING STANDARDS AND <br /> <br />ORDINANCES; CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT WITH CITY GOVERNMENT <br />? <br />LIVE CYCLE HOUSING <br /> <br />? <br />ENSURE THAT THE CITY IS A LEADER IN SUSTAINABLE DESIGN <br /> <br />? <br />TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT: ACTIVELY WORK WITH RAMSEY <br /> <br />COUNTY AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA FOR COORDINATION OF <br />TRANSPORTATION AND LAND USE ISSUES, CONSIDERING ALL FUNDING <br />MECHANISMS (i.e., METROPLITAN COUNCIL, STATE AND FEDERAL) AND <br />RECSOURCES <br />? <br />CONSERVE ENERGY AND REDUCE POLLUTION <br /> <br />? <br />TRAIL DEVELOPMENT <br /> <br /> <br />d. Discuss Relationship of Comprehensive Plan Update to <br />Imagine Roseville 2025 <br />Interim Community Development Director Mike Darrow provided an update to the <br />Commission on the Comprehensive Plan Update prior to presentation of materials <br />and discussion with the City Council and Planning Commission at their upcoming joint <br />meeting scheduled for Monday, August 20, 2007. <br /> <br />Mr. Darrow reviewed current (2003) Comprehensive Plan contents outlining the <br />specific section, responsible department, and recommended update process; and an <br />updated staff-projected process and timeline for completing the document and <br />submission of a draft to neighboring jurisdictions, and ultimately the Metropolitan <br />Council. <br /> <br />Mr. Darrow advised of their initial meetings with the three consultant finalists, and the <br />matrix provided for the City Council with each firm’s responses to staff questions. Mr. <br />Darrow noted that staff’s goal was to achieve a consensus of pending process issues, <br />including interviews and hiring of the consultant, with interviews currently scheduled in <br />the afternoon and hiring action anticipated at the August 27, 2007 City Council <br />meeting; Council approval for the make-up of the steering committee and proposed <br />meeting schedule; and firm development of the punch list on those sections requiring <br />completion under State Statute by the Metropolitan Council, and those sections <br />allowing for more consideration or later development. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.