CC_Minutes_2007_0924 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Regular City Council Meeting Monday, September 24, 2007 Minutes Page 13 Ms. Bloom distributed a bench handout, and noted receipt earlier today of an e- mail from Kalen Graham, JLT Group, providing documentation describing the sale of Lot 2, Block 1, Venture 4`h Addition (addressed as 2700 County Road C) to MSP/Roseville, LLC from JLT Roseville Corporate Center, LLC. Ms. Bloom reviewed State Statute, Chapter 429, process requirements to provide notice to the property owner of record; and advised that she would seek the advice of the City Attorney regarding how to proceed. Mayor Klausing closed the Public Hearing at approximately 7:15 p.m. Roe moved, Pust seconded, recess and continuation of the Public Hearing for Pro- ject 06-12, County Road C Reconstruction Project -Phase II, to the October 8, 2007 regular City Council meeting, to allow staff time to research questions and objections raised at the initial hearing. Roll Call Ayes: Roe; Pust; Ihlan; Kough; and Klausing. Nays: None. City Engineer Bloom reminded those affected property owners watching tonight's meeting at home to contact her directly at City Hall, 651-792-7042, with any questions, comments or concerns. c. Public Hearing - Conduct a Public Hearing and Consider a Minor Subdivi- sion for Dan Westlund at 3080 Fairview Mayor Klausing opened the Public Hearing at 7:16 p.m. Associate City Planner Bryan Lloyd reviewed request of Mr. Westlund to divide two (2) residential parcels into three (3) residential parcels. Councilmember Ihlan sought clarification of staff report item 5.2 related to drain- age containment. Mr. Lloyd briefly reviewed City Code requirements, outside the scope of a minor subdivision, for the applicant to prepare plans demonstrating compliance prior to issuance of any building permits, with review and monitoring of that process by the City's engineering deparhnent. Councilmember Ihlan sought additional clarification of staff report item 5.7 and limitations for single-residential properties at a maximum total impervious cover- age of thirty percent (30%) of the overall parcel area. Mr. Lloyd advised that his calculations, and those of the applicant's surveyor, in- dicated that all three (3) lots showed less than the thirty percent (30%) maximum.