CC_Minutes_2007_1008 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Regular City Council Meeting Monday, October 08, 2007 Page 18 Mr. Darrow advised that staff had contacted several of the reviewing agencies, as part of their due diligence over the past two (2) weeks; and had confirmed that those agencies had received the appropriate maps showing the correct location of the field house, and that they were part of the record and had been distributed to the reviewing agencies. (4) Related to transportation issues at Lydia and Fairview Avenues, Mr. Darrow advised that the language contained in part I O.d of the PUD Agreement presented on September 24, 2007 to the City Council related to the traffic study update process had not changed. Councilmember Pust clarified that Mr. Darrow was stating for the record tonight, and for her and the public's benefit, that the issue raised at the September 24, 2007 meeting as to whether the correct map was attached to the EAW and pre- sented to the reviewing agencies for the EAW was indeed the correct map, and that it had been reviewed by those agencies as discussed. Mr. Darrow responded affirmatively Councilmember Ihlan sought documentation of Mr. barrow's conversations with the reviewing agencies as referenced. Mr. Darrow advised that he would need to get back to Councilmember Ihlan with that information; that he didn't have it available with him at tonight's meeting, with the exception of his comments related to previous meeting minutes. Councilmember Kough questioned why the PUD Agreement had no completion date stipulated. Mr. Darrow clarified that any potential location or condition as it related to the PUD Agreement would still need to meet City ordinance, including shoreland or- dinances, and the PUD Agreement did not identify an exact location for specific structures. Mr. Darrow noted that, when an application was brought forward, the applicant would need to meet setback requirements as per City Code, as well as other reviewing agency (i.e., Watershed District) regulations. Councilmember Kough expressed his leeriness in approving the plans, in light of traffic to be generated; and the college needing to accept responsibility for addi- tional traffic. Councilmember Kough opined that, while he supported the project moving forward, it was hard for him to approve it without including specific dates and timelines. Mayor Klausing clarified that Section 10.d of the PUD Agreement specifically identified traffic issues; with mitigation strategies detailed in the EAW.