My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2007_0910
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2007
>
CC_Minutes_2007_0910
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/23/2007 2:34:23 PM
Creation date
10/23/2007 2:34:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
9/10/2007
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
56
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, September 10, 200'7 <br />Page 12 <br />discussion was related to the Parks and Recreation portion of the Gen- <br />eral Fund. <br />Councilmember Ihlan asked Mr. Miller to indicate the proposed total <br />percentage increase to the tax levy resulting from the City Manager <br />recommended budget at 15.7% and the proposed HRA levy budget <br />levy. <br />Mr. Miller estimated that the total levy increase would be approxi- <br />mately 19%, representing an estimated $109/year, or $9/month in- <br />crease to an average home with a 5% increase in their market value. <br />Mayor Klausing opined that, it was his observation that percentage in- <br />creases skewed actual costs and benefits of services and programs <br />provided; and further opined that it was incumbent upon the City <br />Council to identify those items being funded. Mayor Klausing noted <br />that the City Manager's recommendations included many unfunded <br />mandates and met requirements for OSHA; Imagine Roseville 2025 <br />initiatives; complying with budget reserve policies; and encouraged <br />Councilmembers and the public to look at actual dollars and impacts <br />and implications of those dollars. <br />Councilmember Kough noted increased costs for employee health <br />care benefits that needed to be included in the levy proposal; in addi- <br />tion to COLA increases; and overall contributions to all departments <br />and to make the best out of what was available. <br />Discussion included COLA at 3.5% in the City Manager recom- <br />mended budget; peer municipalities and Stanton V comparisons; col- <br />lective bargaining unit contract agreements, negotiations, and status of <br />multi-year contract language and provisions; health insurance in- <br />creases; non-disparities of non-union and union employees; and con- <br />figuration of those employees covered by union agreements and those <br />non-union employees. <br />Councilmember Pust sought clarification from Mr. Miller on whether <br />contract language included an escalator. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.