Laserfiche WebLink
Metadata
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015 Laserfiche. All rights reserved.
e lar ity C® c eeti <br />on ay, ct® er <br />age 1 ~ <br />prehensive Plan amendments allowing for more quantifiable measurements rather <br />than open interpretation. <br />Councilmember Pust spoke in support of a 500' notice; required neighborhood <br />meetings by the developer; notice of Planning Commission public hearing and <br />City Council meeting to consider, with language specifically indicating that there <br />would not be a public hearing at the City Council level; and increased notice area <br />for controversially-defined projects, but not as a standard practice for all land use <br />applications. <br />Councilmember Kough spoke in support of the Public Hearing process; and if <br />there was something of special interest in a certain area, to consider special meet- <br />ings for those people. <br />Mayor Klausing spoke in support of a 500' notice for Planning Commission and <br />City Council meetings; notice of neighborhood lead meetings; and clarifying ac- <br />tion at the Planning Commission and City Council levels. <br />Councilmember Roe spoke in support of a sliding scale, and some projects that <br />may require a more widespread notice, based on dimensions; clarified notice of <br />Planning Commission and City Council actions; and neighborhood meetings <br />ahead of Planning Commission action, based on certain criteria. <br />Councilmember Ihlan spoke in support of the Edina model, noticing 1,000' for all <br />cases; noticing both the Planning Commission and City Council meetings; en- <br />couraging the developer to hold neighborhood meetings, but not requiring them; <br />and potential recouping of notice costs through developer fees to provide an in- <br />creased scope of notice. <br />Mr. Darrow advised he would research current practice in recouping fees. <br />No further action taken. <br />e. Imagi~ze Roseville 2025 Strategic Planning <br />Mayor Klausing clarified previous conversations that the column titles needed to <br />be renamed from "Strategy" and "Item" to "Goals" and "Strategies" respectively. <br />Mayor Klausing polled Councilmembers on how to identify goals, how to sort <br />and/or prioritize for the next stage to determine short and long-term goals, as <br />some of the items identified at the strategy level addressed a broader scope. <br />Councilmember Roe opined that the previous process to get to this point seemed <br />to work well; however, noted that this portion of the process would prove more <br />difficult, in order to weigh individual interests and find consensus or majority <br />support. Councilmember Roe further opined staff could not be directed to work <br />