CC_Minutes_2007_1022 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

e lar ity C® c eeti on ay, ct® er age 1 ~ prehensive Plan amendments allowing for more quantifiable measurements rather than open interpretation. Councilmember Pust spoke in support of a 500' notice; required neighborhood meetings by the developer; notice of Planning Commission public hearing and City Council meeting to consider, with language specifically indicating that there would not be a public hearing at the City Council level; and increased notice area for controversially-defined projects, but not as a standard practice for all land use applications. Councilmember Kough spoke in support of the Public Hearing process; and if there was something of special interest in a certain area, to consider special meet- ings for those people. Mayor Klausing spoke in support of a 500' notice for Planning Commission and City Council meetings; notice of neighborhood lead meetings; and clarifying ac- tion at the Planning Commission and City Council levels. Councilmember Roe spoke in support of a sliding scale, and some projects that may require a more widespread notice, based on dimensions; clarified notice of Planning Commission and City Council actions; and neighborhood meetings ahead of Planning Commission action, based on certain criteria. Councilmember Ihlan spoke in support of the Edina model, noticing 1,000' for all cases; noticing both the Planning Commission and City Council meetings; en- couraging the developer to hold neighborhood meetings, but not requiring them; and potential recouping of notice costs through developer fees to provide an in- creased scope of notice. Mr. Darrow advised he would research current practice in recouping fees. No further action taken. e. Imagi~ze Roseville 2025 Strategic Planning Mayor Klausing clarified previous conversations that the column titles needed to be renamed from "Strategy" and "Item" to "Goals" and "Strategies" respectively. Mayor Klausing polled Councilmembers on how to identify goals, how to sort and/or prioritize for the next stage to determine short and long-term goals, as some of the items identified at the strategy level addressed a broader scope. Councilmember Roe opined that the previous process to get to this point seemed to work well; however, noted that this portion of the process would prove more difficult, in order to weigh individual interests and find consensus or majority support. Councilmember Roe further opined staff could not be directed to work