CC_Minutes_2007_1022 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

eg ar° iy ® cii Ceti ®n ay, ct® er 7 age 2 ing ideas, and personally ranking each; then indicate their top five (5) for the first twelve (12) month range; then the intermediate group of five (5); then their long- term selection of five (5). It was Council consensus that a considerable amount of time be set aside for this discussion at the I~Tovember 19, 2007 Council meeting. f City a~ager~ eview _ Councilmember Pust presented a draft form for Council review of a "mini 360 degree" evaluation for City Manager Malinen's six (6} month review, as created by a subcommittee of Councilmembers Roe and Pust, along with input from City Manager Malinen, and items identified in his contract. Councilmember Pust ad- vised that Councilmember Roe would be speaking to a more detailed annual re- view format for future reviews, currently being drafted for Council review and comment. Councilmember Pust advised that, it was being recommended by the subcommittee for this initial review, and due to the City Manager's limited time and involvement in the community to-date, that the review would be completed by individual Councilmembers, City Department Heads, two (2) staff members not direct reports to Mr. Malinen; and while still under discussion, potentially a representation of broad-based community input, possible members of the Imagine Roseville 2025 Steering Committee. Councilmember Pust advised that, her per- sonal rationale for suggesting this community-based group was to avoid a lengthy selection process for citizen involvement for this initial review, recognizing that the City Council had recently appointed this representation of the community. Councilmember Roe addressed suggestions included in the packet for Council consideration for proposed long-term goals for future evaluations; advising that the model for the form was taken from an evaluation form used in Tacoma, WA. Councilmember Roe concurred that specifics of that proposed form were not ap- plicable to Mr. Malinen's short-term with the City for this first evaluation period. Councilmember Pust requested designation of Councilmember Roe and her as a subcommittee to complete the process, followed by a discussion and the actual review by the whole City Council in executive session, to allow the subcommittee to collect data, keep the process as anonymous as possible, and to avoid any con- flicts for staff. It was Council consensus to designate Councilmembers Pust and Roe as the sub- committee during this process, and they advised they would provide individual Councilmembers with final forms for the short-term evaluation. Councilmembers were encouraged to provide comment and -feedback outside the Council meeting to Councilmembers Pust and Roe as they finalized the evalua- tions, both short and long term forms.